feat: use navigation sequence metadata to disable navigation components

[mariajgrimaldi]

Settings

EDX_PLATFORM_REPOSITORY: https://github.com/eduNEXT/edx-platform.git
EDX_PLATFORM_VERSION: MJG/hide-from-navigation-toc

TUTOR_GROVE_CMS_ENV_FEATURES: |
  ENABLE_HIDE_FROM_TOC_UI: True

Description

This PR adds a flag check to navigation components (next/previous buttons & course sequence breadcrumbs) to disable them if navigation_disabled is True.

The navigation_disabled field comes from this edx-platform PR: openedx/openedx-platform#34049, which returns the new field as sequence metadata, based on whether the sequence was configured as Hide from TOC. This kind of flag could also be extended for other use cases, not just hidden from TOC.

These changes are part of a series of PR(s) that implement the Feature Enhancement Proposal: Hide Sections from course outline:
https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+hide+from+toc
https://github.com/openedx/frontend-app-learning/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+hide+from+toc

How to test

Test setup using tutor:

1. git clone https://github.com/openedx/frontend-app-learning.git
2. git fetch origin pull/1273/head:hide-from-sequence-nav
3. Then, run: tutor mounts add ./frontend-app-learning
4. cd frontend-app-learning && npm install, ensure you're using node 18
5. tutor dev launch

It's better to test this out along with this PR: openedx/openedx-platform#33952. So first, follow the instructions in that PR. Don't change branches; apply these commits on top of the branch.

For the Learning MFE changes, please follow the instructions listed here. Then, go to the LMS using the link to your hidden subsection, it should look something like this with > 1 and exactly 1:

Screencast.from.13-02-24.12.55.13.mp4

With 1 unit it doesn't show prev, next and sequence breadcrumbs. With more than one, it shows next and previous for units within the same sequence.

Other information

As I mentioned, this PR is part of a series of PRs implementing the feature enhancement of Hide From TOC. This initiative is an open-source contribution to the Open edX platform funded by a Unidigital project from the Spanish Government - 2023.

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @mariajgrimaldi! Please note that it may take us up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

Feel free to add as much of the following information to the ticket as you can:

• supporting documentation
• Open edX discussion forum threads
• timeline information ("this must be merged by XX date", and why that is)
• partner information ("this is a course on edx.org")
• any other information that can help Product understand the context for the PR

All technical communication about the code itself will be done via the GitHub pull request interface. As a reminder, our process documentation is here.

Please let us know once your PR is ready for our review and all tests are green.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.40%. Comparing base (7c8e26d) to head (523ab85).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1273      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.38%   88.40%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         291      291              
  Lines        4951     4959       +8     
  Branches     1253     1262       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits         4376     4384       +8     
  Misses        561      561              
  Partials       14       14              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[itsjeyd]

Hi @mariajgrimaldi, thank you for this contribution!

Like #1262, it seems to relate to openedx/platform-roadmap#301, so I'm flagging it for product review.

CC @jmakowski1123

[santiagosuarezedunext]

Hi Tim, this has already gone through product review, it was discussed and approved in this post. greetings!
CC: @jmakowski1123

[johnvente]

LGTM! thanks

[BryanttV]

Hi @mariajgrimaldi, I tested this PR in my local and it works correctly!

[itsjeyd]

Hey @mariajgrimaldi, aside from fixing conflicts this still needs approval from a CC and/or maintainer, right?

[mariajgrimaldi]

Sorry for the delay, @itsjeyd, yes! We still need the maintainers' approval.

[arbrandes]

I'll bite. Let's see if we can get this working in a PR sandbox, first.

[mariajgrimaldi]

@arbrandes: this needs openedx/openedx-platform#34049 to work. Is there a way to configure it? If we can't configure it, I'll let you know the PR is merged.

[arbrandes]

Yes, there is! I just did (see the Settings section at the top of the PR description). Let's see if it works. It'll take up to an hour for the sandbox to come up.

[open-craft-grove]

Sandbox deployment successful 🚀
🎓 LMS
📝 Studio
ℹ️ Grove Config, Tutor Config, Tutor Requirements

[arbrandes]

I've tested this in the sandbox, and it works! Now, to look at the code.

[arbrandes]

Just a couple of changes, otherwise looks and works great!

[mariajgrimaldi]

@arbrandes: comments addressed. Thank you!

[open-craft-grove]

Sandbox deployment successful 🚀
🎓 LMS
📝 Studio
ℹ️ Grove Config, Tutor Config, Tutor Requirements

[openedx-webhooks]

@mariajgrimaldi 🎉 Your pull request was merged! Please take a moment to answer a two question survey so we can improve your experience in the future.