-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Backport] fix: bypass access checks when populating course blocks cache #35919
[Backport] fix: bypass access checks when populating course blocks cache #35919
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, @asadali145! What's next?Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review: 🔘 Get product approvalIf you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.
🔘 Provide contextTo help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:
🔘 Get a green buildIf one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green. 🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:Who will review my changes?This repository is currently maintained by Where can I find more information?If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:
When can I expect my changes to be merged?Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible. However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:
💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
@regisb could you please rebase the sumac branch in edly fork onto the sumac.master
after the merge of this PR to preserve this fix on the demo instance?
overhangio/tutor-forum@57e4eaf#diff-0d2d2c5ee050cc46953dd441dc0d4182751734361acf18294183d2928664418eR29
Thanks @cmltaWt0! I'm going to go ahead and merge this. |
Description
Backport of #35655 for Sumac
Testing instructions
Same as the original PR.