Skip to content

Remove GOARCH from the go build - #921

Closed
mkumatag wants to merge 1 commit into
opendatahub-io:incubationfrom
odh-on-pz:patch-1
Closed

mkumatag wants to merge 1 commit into
opendatahub-io:incubationfrom
odh-on-pz:patch-1

Conversation

@mkumatag

@mkumatag mkumatag commented Mar 17, 2024 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

GOARCH will be set by default to the target architecture, explicit mention of GOARCH is not necessary. This change will give flexibility to build this image on non-amd64 platform.

How Has This Been Tested?

Podman build:

% podman build -t opendatahub-operator:latest -f ./Dockerfiles/Dockerfile .
[1/4] STEP 1/6: FROM registry.access.redhat.com/ubi8/go-toolset:1.19 AS builder_local_false
[1/4] STEP 2/6: ARG OVERWRITE_MANIFESTS
--> 66127cb9c850
[1/4] STEP 3/6: USER root
--> afb17858b3be
[1/4] STEP 4/6: WORKDIR /opt
--> 16f00e5a32af
[1/4] STEP 5/6: COPY get_all_manifests.sh get_all_manifests.sh
--> 2e53fa9c87e6
[1/4] STEP 6/6: RUN ./get_all_manifests.sh ${OVERWRITE_MANIFESTS}
Cloning repo kserve: opendatahub-io:kserve:release-v0.11.1:config:kserve
Cloning repo odh-dashboard: opendatahub-io:odh-dashboard:incubation:manifests:dashboard
Cloning repo odh-notebook-controller: opendatahub-io:kubeflow:v1.7-branch:components/odh-notebook-controller/config:odh-notebook-controller/odh-notebook-controller
Cloning repo notebooks: opendatahub-io:notebooks:main:manifests:notebooks
Cloning repo odh-model-controller: opendatahub-io:odh-model-controller:release-0.11.1:config:odh-model-controller
Cloning repo kueue: opendatahub-io:kueue:dev:config:kueue
Cloning repo ray: opendatahub-io:kuberay:master:ray-operator/config:ray
Cloning repo modelregistry: opendatahub-io:model-registry-operator:main:config:model-registry-operator
Cloning repo kf-notebook-controller: opendatahub-io:kubeflow:v1.7-branch:components/notebook-controller/config:odh-notebook-controller/kf-notebook-controller
Cloning repo data-science-pipelines-operator: opendatahub-io:data-science-pipelines-operator:main:config:data-science-pipelines-operator
Cloning repo trustyai: trustyai-explainability:trustyai-service-operator:release/1.10.2:config:trustyai-service-operator
Cloning repo model-mesh: opendatahub-io:modelmesh-serving:release-0.11.1:config:model-mesh
Cloning repo codeflare: opendatahub-io:codeflare-operator:main:config:codeflare
--> 0588b4f5b6d8
[3/4] STEP 1/12: FROM 0588b4f5b6d86d0c4ca7475a1dc567de4abff7076b08c3e758220bdf89456617 AS builder
[3/4] STEP 2/12: USER root
--> a5381ce9b4cd
[3/4] STEP 3/12: WORKDIR /workspace
--> a8234c793cf0
[3/4] STEP 4/12: COPY go.mod go.mod
--> 4ed411ad026a
[3/4] STEP 5/12: COPY go.sum go.sum
--> b0f041d5b250
[3/4] STEP 6/12: RUN go mod download
--> 99de042d53e6
[3/4] STEP 7/12: COPY apis/ apis/
--> dfe8e62cf195
[3/4] STEP 8/12: COPY components/ components/
--> 66d72c821923
[3/4] STEP 9/12: COPY controllers/ controllers/
--> 9818217ab117
[3/4] STEP 10/12: COPY main.go main.go
--> 726adb96a87f
[3/4] STEP 11/12: COPY pkg/ pkg/
--> d1ad9f14f92a
[3/4] STEP 12/12: RUN CGO_ENABLED=0 GOOS=linux go build -a -o manager main.go
--> 7c5fe820cf88
[4/4] STEP 1/7: FROM registry.access.redhat.com/ubi8/ubi-minimal:latest
Trying to pull registry.access.redhat.com/ubi8/ubi-minimal:latest...
Getting image source signatures
Checking if image destination supports signatures
Copying blob sha256:e3649b5f99e0fcf52b3d19c3b201484e78f19873fb98a5b5a4b3a4d64c75ae78
Copying config sha256:f0dc20fdb65a920a81ec9cd7bcbb294d875a4115c11a15e1daf442c80a54dc70
Writing manifest to image destination
Storing signatures
[4/4] STEP 2/7: WORKDIR /
--> 09cd862077c9
[4/4] STEP 3/7: COPY --from=builder /workspace/manager .
--> 92fc24859491
[4/4] STEP 4/7: COPY --chown=1001:0 --from=builder /opt/odh-manifests /opt/manifests
--> 2c6c111be5b2
[4/4] STEP 5/7: RUN chown -R 1001:0 /opt/manifests &&    chmod -R a+r /opt/manifests
--> 29d7e7732edc
[4/4] STEP 6/7: USER 1001
--> 9e2153c59efc
[4/4] STEP 7/7: ENTRYPOINT ["/manager"]
[4/4] COMMIT opendatahub-operator:latest
--> f96c3d30c2ad
Successfully tagged localhost/opendatahub-operator:latest
f96c3d30c2aded7fa171a29e7e19d3bf4a5f4bf904b17ffee153cc7d38769e64

Podman run:

% podman run -ti opendatahub-operator:latest --help
Usage of /manager:
  -dsc-applications-namespace string
    	The namespace where data science clusterapplications will be deployed (default "opendatahub")
  -dsc-monitoring-namespace string
    	The namespace where data science clustermonitoring stack will be deployed (default "opendatahub")
  -health-probe-bind-address string
    	The address the probe endpoint binds to. (default ":8081")
  -kubeconfig string
    	Paths to a kubeconfig. Only required if out-of-cluster.
  -leader-elect
    	Enable leader election for controller manager. Enabling this will ensure there is only one active controller manager.
  -metrics-bind-address string
    	The address the metric endpoint binds to. (default ":8080")
  -zap-devel
    	Development Mode defaults(encoder=consoleEncoder,logLevel=Debug,stackTraceLevel=Warn). Production Mode defaults(encoder=jsonEncoder,logLevel=Info,stackTraceLevel=Error) (default true)
  -zap-encoder value
    	Zap log encoding (one of 'json' or 'console')
  -zap-log-level value
    	Zap Level to configure the verbosity of logging. Can be one of 'debug', 'info', 'error', or any integer value > 0 which corresponds to custom debug levels of increasing verbosity
  -zap-stacktrace-level value
    	Zap Level at and above which stacktraces are captured (one of 'info', 'error', 'panic').
  -zap-time-encoding value
    	Zap time encoding (one of 'epoch', 'millis', 'nano', 'iso8601', 'rfc3339' or 'rfc3339nano'). Defaults to 'epoch'.

Merge criteria:

  • The commits are squashed in a cohesive manner and have meaningful messages.
  • Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
  • The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign ykaliuta for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi @mkumatag. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a opendatahub-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@zdtsw

zdtsw commented Mar 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

i think the quesiton is: if this is a new feature request to officially support operator running on arch more than x86_64?
it is not simply removing a build flag but we need to verify this for every release.
also I am curious what is the driven to have this? if it is just for operator or to have the real workload on aarc/ppc64le eventually?

@zdtsw
zdtsw requested review from VaishnaviHire and removed request for astefanutti March 17, 2024 18:36
@mkumatag

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

i think the quesiton is: if this is a new feature request to officially support operator running on arch more than x86_64? it is not simply removing a build flag but we need to verify this for every release. also I am curious what is the driven to have this? if it is just for operator or to have the real workload on aarc/ppc64le eventually?

Our long-term goal is to ensure this project is supported on platforms like ppc64le. However, currently, our focus lies on preparing the codebase to build and run smoothly on any non-amd64 platform. This initial phase is crucial for developers to easily engage with the project and gain familiarity with it.

This preparatory work should be conducted without disrupting existing support or the project's workflow. I'm open to discussing this topic further if needed.

Comment thread Dockerfiles/Dockerfile Outdated

# Build
RUN CGO_ENABLED=0 GOOS=linux GOARCH=amd64 go build -a -o manager main.go
RUN CGO_ENABLED=0 GOOS=linux go build -a -o manager main.go

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Following this reasoning, I wonder if we need GOOS here too?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you are right, we can remove GOOS as well.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed GOOS too, ptal at the latest code.

Signed-off-by: Manjunath Kumatagi <mkumatag@in.ibm.com>
@zdtsw

zdtsw commented Feb 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

should we close this @mkumatag

@mkumatag

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

yes, this can be closed.

@mkumatag mkumatag closed this Feb 11, 2025
kpunwatk added a commit to kpunwatk/opendatahub-operator that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2026
opendatahub-io#925 sync

Pick up post-sync mirror SHAs: ODH main @0b428d2 (opendatahub-io#197) and
rhoai-3.6-ea.2 @5f278d7 (opendatahub-io#1949), including the emptyDir/clearDir fix.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
openshift-merge-bot Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2026
* feat: migrate TrustyAI from component to module

Rewrites the TrustyAI module handler against the current ModuleHandler
interface (PopulatePlatformModule/IsEnabled/BuildModuleCR signatures and
ModuleConfig fields changed significantly since the previous attempt in
PR #3643, which predates the DAG-orchestration and common
action-framework refactors). Follows sparkoperator's handler as the
template, since both are out-of-tree kustomize-based modules with their
own dedicated operator image.

- Add internal/controller/modules/trustyai/handler.go + handler_test.go
- Add PlatformModules.TrustyAI field (DSC mode only for now; Platform/xKS
  mode deferred pending API updates, matching the original migration's
  scope decision)
- Register TrustyAI in existingModules/moduleRunlevels (RL(32), after
  KServe's RL(31), since TrustyAI depends on KServe CRDs)
- Remove TrustyAI from existingComponents/componentRunlevels and delete
  the legacy in-tree component controller and its monitoring resources
- CRName uses componentApi.TrustyAIInstanceName ("default-trustyai"),
  now aligned with the trustyai-operator-module CRD's own singleton
  validation (see companion fix in trustyai-service-operator)

* fix(trustyai): use current image var name, add RHOAI build-config exception

RELATED_IMAGE_ODH_TRUSTYAI_SERVICE_IMAGE was renamed to
RELATED_IMAGE_ODH_TRUSTYAI_SERVICE_PY_IMAGE (#4011) before this
migration branch was rebased; the RelatedImages list still had the
stale name. Also adds an RHOAI-Build-Config exception for the new
RELATED_IMAGE_ODH_TRUSTYAI_MODULE_OPERATOR_IMAGE, matching the
trainer/sparkoperator module operator images (RHOAIENG-80231,
delivering in RHOAI 3.6 EA2). Confirmed via `make validate-related-images`
locally: 2 errors -> 0.

* docs: regenerate api-overview for TrustyAI module field

make generate manifests-all api-docs picked up the new
PlatformModules.TrustyAI field added in the previous commit.

* fix(trustyai): register manifests-config entry, fix ManifestDir/ContextDir mismatch

Two bugs causing "must build at directory: not a valid directory:
evalsymlink failure on '/opt/manifests/trustyai-module-operator/default'"
at deploy time:

- manifests-config.yaml had no entry for the module at all, so
  `make get-manifests` never fetched it. Added trustyai-module-operator,
  reusing the exact same repo/ref pins as the existing trustyai
  (component) entry, since both mirrors already have
  trustyai-operator-module/ at those SHAs -- confirmed via the GitHub
  API before adding.

- handler.go's ManifestDir was missing ContextDir: "default". Every
  other kustomize-based module (e.g. trainer) points sourcePath at the
  whole `config` directory and lets ContextDir select the `default`
  overlay at render time; PlatformModules.String() joins Path+ContextDir,
  so without it the platform looked for manifests directly under
  ManifestDir instead of ManifestDir/default -- the exact directory
  missing in the reported error.

Verified end to end: `make get-manifests` now fetches
trustyai-operator-module/config/{crd,rbac,manager,default} correctly,
and `kustomize build opt/manifests/trustyai-module-operator/default`
renders successfully.

* fix(trustyai): align RBAC markers and e2e tests with module architecture

RBAC markers for the trustyais CR belonged in internal/controller/modules
(module-managed), not datasciencecluster; moved them accordingly with no
change to generated output. Updated dag_ordering_test.go and
resilience_test.go to treat TrustyAI as a module like the other
already-migrated components (Trainer, Workbenches, Dashboard, AIHub),
matching gaps found by comparing against PR #4000.

* fix(trustyai): reuse existing trustyai manifests-config entry instead of a duplicate

The old trustyai entry (sourcePath: config) pointed at the removed in-tree
component manifests and had no remaining code consumer, so keeping a
separate trustyai-module-operator entry alongside it was redundant.
Repointed the existing entry's sourcePath at the module manifests and
dropped the duplicate.

* fix(trustyai): explicitly map permit fields instead of blind struct conversion

BuildModuleCR converted the whole DSC-facing TrustyAICommonSpec into the
module CR's spec via runtime.DefaultUnstructuredConverter. The DSC-facing
API declares permitCodeExecution/permitOnline as a string enum
("allow"/"deny") while the module CRD declares them as bool, so the
wholesale conversion projected a string into a field the module's typed
client expects to be bool, breaking its watch/list reflector on
existing CRs. Map the two permit fields explicitly with the
string-to-bool conversion instead.

Reported-by: Steven Tobin

* fix(trustyai): bump rhoai manifest pin to pick up CR-naming fix

The rhoai-3.6-ea.2 pin predated commit 5ed6709 (fix(module): align
TrustyAI singleton CR name with sibling modules), so the deployed
module CRD still required metadata.name == 'default' while
BuildModuleCR creates 'default-trustyai', causing every apply to be
rejected by the CRD's own CEL validation. Bumped to the branch's
current tip, which already includes the fix (verified via
GitHub compare API and by re-downloading manifests locally).

The odh pin (opendatahub-io/trustyai-service-operator@incubation)
still needs the same fix; that branch hasn't been re-synced from
main since before the fix landed, so it's left unchanged pending
that sync.

Reported-by: Steven Tobin

* fix(trustyai): switch odh manifest pin from incubation to main

The incubation branch (opendatahub-io/trustyai-service-operator) is
synced from that repo's own main via a separate, infrequent process
(last sync 2026-08-05), and hasn't picked up the CR-naming CEL fix
(commit 5ed6709, landed 2026-09-01) that the rhoai pin already has.
Waiting on that sync is unbounded, and this file already has
precedent for pinning odh directly at main (see the modelregistry
entry), so switch to main@<sha> instead. Verified the pinned commit
contains the fix by fetching the CRD directly and confirming the
CEL rule reads 'default-trustyai', and by re-running
`make get-manifests` + `kustomize build` locally.

Reported-by: Steven Tobin

* fix(trustyai): bump odh/rhoai manifest pins to pick up module operator fixes

trustyai-service-operator#908 (RBAC watch verbs, /opt write permission,
platform version handshake) has now propagated through both downstream
sync chains:

- odh: opendatahub-io/trustyai-service-operator#194 merged
- rhoai: red-hat-data-services/trustyai-service-operator#1932 (into
  main) and #1934 (main into rhoai-3.6-ea.2) both merged

Bumped both pins to the post-merge tips and verified locally: the
"watch" verb is present on deployments/rolebindings in both ODH and
RHOAI mode, kustomize build succeeds, and go build/test pass.

Reported-by: Steven Tobin

* fix(trustyai): remove redundant CRD-generating types now owned by the module

TrustyAI's Go type still had +kubebuilder:object:root=true on TrustyAI/
TrustyAIList, plus the PlatformObject interface implementation and
scheme registration. Since the CRD is now installed by
trustyai-operator-module (from its own manifests), this caused
opendatahub-operator to generate a second, competing CRD definition
for the same GVK from a Go type that isn't kept in sync with the
module's actual schema (already missing mcpGuardrailsMode and the
default-trustyai singleton validation independently added on each
side).

Removed the top-level TrustyAI/TrustyAIList struct, scheme
registration, and PlatformObject methods, keeping only the nested
spec/status types and DSCTrustyAI/DSCTrustyAIStatus, matching the
pattern already used by sibling modules (see sparkoperator_types.go).

Updated tests/e2e/trustyai_test.go to use NewModuleTestCtx (GVK +
instance name) instead of NewComponentTestCtx (which required a typed
struct) -- this is the existing mechanism other module e2e tests
(kserve_test.go, aigateway_test.go) already use for exactly this case.

Verified via a full config/crd/bases wipe + make manifests that no
components.platform.opendatahub.io_trustyais.yaml is generated anymore.

* fix(trustyai): bump rhoai manifest pin to pick up #913 (services/prometheuses watch)

trustyai-explainability/trustyai-service-operator#913 merged and has
propagated through both red-hat-data-services sync hops (main, then
rhoai-3.6-ea.2). Bumped the rhoai ref and verified locally: services
and prometheuses RBAC rules now include watch.

The odh pin is not bumped yet -- opendatahub-io/trustyai-service-operator#195
(the pull[bot] sync PR) already has the right content but hasn't merged.

* fix(trustyai): temporarily point odh pin at canonical upstream repo

opendatahub-io/trustyai-service-operator#195 (the pull[bot] sync PR
bringing in #913's services/prometheuses watch fix) already has the
right content as its head commit, but is stuck on the OWNERS approval
gate while the approver is on PTO. Rather than wait, point the odh
pin directly at trustyai-explainability/trustyai-service-operator
(the canonical upstream #195 pulls from) at that same commit.

Verified locally: make get-manifests resolves cleanly, RBAC role.yaml
has watch on services/prometheuses, CRD CEL rule reads
'default-trustyai', kustomize build succeeds, go build/test pass.

Switch back to the opendatahub-io mirror once #195 merges.

* switch ODH manifest pin back to opendatahub-io mirror

* bump(trustyai): rhoai manifest pin to pick up rhoai PR #1943

Picks up the same fixes that were merged into the ODH upstream repo.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* bump(trustyai): manifest pins for #920/#921/#925 sync

Pick up post-sync mirror SHAs: ODH main @0b428d2 (#197) and
rhoai-3.6-ea.2 @5f278d7 (#1949), including the emptyDir/clearDir fix.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* bump(trustyai): update module operator image digest to latest build

* sync manager image overrides and regenerate api docs

* chore: resolve image digests after trustyai manifest sync

* bump(trustyai): service operator image only; revert broad digest resolve
Update RELATED_IMAGE_ODH_TRUSTYAI_SERVICE_OPERATOR_IMAGE to fix
--metrics-cert-path crash. Reverts platform-wide resolve-image-digests
from 4e0700d; module operator stays at e5cd204a (#925).

* fix(trustyai): TrustyAI-only image pins at latest validated digests

* fix(trustyai): drop unrelated data-registry rhoai digest from PR

Keep manifests-config image pin changes TrustyAI-only; remove
MOD_ARCH_DATA_REGISTRY rhoai block not in scope for #4051.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* Revert "fix(trustyai): drop unrelated data-registry rhoai digest from PR"
Restore MOD_ARCH_DATA_REGISTRY rhoai mapping from upstream #4073 merge.

* test(e2e): drop TrustyAI from platform-owned CRD validation

TrustyAI is now an out-of-tree module; its CRD is installed by the
module operator when enabled, not by the platform operator at startup.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* chore(manifests): bump trustyai rhoai ref after #1955 sync

Pick up #926 module operator fixes on rhoai-3.6-ea.2 (RELATED_IMAGE mapping,
manifest staging, memory limits).

* chore(manifests): bump trustyai odh ref to pick up #926 fixes

Sync opendatahub-io/trustyai-service-operator main to #202 merge (9c0ffa8).

* chore(manifests): bump trustyai pins for #928 readiness fix

- ODH main@feb5b94 (opendatahub-io #204)
- RHOAI rhoai-3.6-ea.2@75a4af5 (#1956 / #928 on rhoai)
- Module-operator image digest d2df18f5 (Konflux build for feb5b94)

* chore(manifests): align TrustyAI module-operator image with build configs

- ODH: quay.io/opendatahub/odh-trustyai-module-operator@b3cef1149
- RHOAI: quay.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-module-operator-rhel9@51384d9610
- Remove stale rhoai_exceptions entry (RHOAIENG-80231 onboarded)

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* feat(trustyai): propagate MCP Guardrails mode

Signed-off-by: Rui Vieira <ruidevieira@googlemail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8a76d74)

* chore(docs): regenerate api-overview after Ray/TrustyAI module migration

Drop Ray and TrustyAI from the platform-owned Resource Types index so
make api-docs matches CI (Ensure generated files are included).

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* fix(trustyai): bump module refs to include mcpGuardrailsMode in CRD schema

ODH: main@7838ba58fffca619610c6b260c4ec87c031d0a27 (was feb5b944...)
RHOAI: rhoai-3.6-ea.2@9a3b7b9f4f936419451c833b70ba180fe03a3e61 (was 75a4af5b...)

The previous refs lacked mcpGuardrailsMode in the TrustyAI CRD schema,
causing deployment failures when trying to apply the field: "field not
declared in schema". Newer upstream commits include this field.

Fixes e2e test failure: "unable to patch components.platform.opendatahub.io/v1alpha1,
Kind=TrustyAI default-trustyai: failed to create typed patch object: .spec.mcpGuardrailsMode:
field not declared in schema"

* fix(trustyai): bump module operator image digests to latest builds

Update both ODH and RHOAI image digests to the latest trustyai-module-operator
builds that include the MCP guardrails fix:

- ODH: sha256:65cba5211000f9b13b87b2bd9f1fb052ea814e1826e53f498edd84209d877b6e
  (midstream incubation→stable sync by Rui, synced to ODH)
- RHOAI: sha256:e6a0be61ecbedf259b80fc2a63ae8ee975aa18a6a6743538554b21bab9f7bd4c

Previous digests were stale and not available in the registry, causing
e2e test deployment failures with missing CRD fields.

* test(trustyai): override ValidateOperandsOwnerReferences for modular architecture

TrustyAI is now a module operator that deploys operands with different labels.
Override the parent test implementation to use the correct TrustyAI-specific label
'app.kubernetes.io/part-of: trustyai' instead of the generic component label,
and verify operands are owned by the TrustyAI CR by kind and name.

* style(test): fix import order in trustyai_test.go

* align the trusty tests to the module architecture

* Align RHOAI TrustyAI Module operator with RHOAI manifests

* Fix Missing Components CRD Handling test

---------

Signed-off-by: Rui Vieira <ruidevieira@googlemail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Rui Vieira <ruidevieira@googlemail.com>
Co-authored-by: Steven Tobin <stobin@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Marián Macik <mmacik@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants