Skip to content

Conversation

@wking
Copy link
Contributor

@wking wking commented Apr 5, 2017

And bump DTSTAMP for the touched VEVENTS.

com.android.calendar version 7.1.1 only displays the DESCRIPTION body, and does not provide a link to ALTREP (in fact, I don't see any instances of ALTREP in the source). Including the README link in the DESCRIPTION body gives folks using that calendar application an easy way to get to the README section.

The ICS was validated here.

This will conflict with #757. There's already one LGTM there, so I suggest landing that one first. However, I'm happy to rebase whichever PR lands second.

@wking wking force-pushed the ics-description-link-readme branch from b4bed00 to 9a497c2 Compare April 6, 2017 14:20
And bump DTSTAMP for the touched VEVENTS.

com.android.calendar version 7.1.1 only displays the DESCRIPTION body,
and does not provide a link to ALTREP (in fact, I don't see any
instances of ALTREP in the source [1]).  Including the README link in
the DESCRIPTION body gives folks using that calendar application an
easy way to get to the README section.

The ICS was validated with [2].

[1]: https://android.googlesource.com/platform/packages/apps/Calendar/+/android-7.1.1_r38
[2]: https://icalendar.org/validator.html

Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <[email protected]>
@wking
Copy link
Contributor Author

wking commented Apr 6, 2017

Rebased around #757 withb4bed00 → 9a497c2.

@hqhq
Copy link
Contributor

hqhq commented Apr 10, 2017

LGTM

Approved with PullApprove

1 similar comment
@vbatts
Copy link
Member

vbatts commented Apr 10, 2017

LGTM

Approved with PullApprove

@vbatts vbatts merged commit af9e4b3 into opencontainers:master Apr 10, 2017
@wking wking deleted the ics-description-link-readme branch April 12, 2017 03:51
@vbatts vbatts mentioned this pull request Jul 5, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants