Add Go types for specification #51
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
crosbymichael
force-pushed
the
addtypes
branch
2 times, most recently
from
3450504 to
f25e5fc
Compare
Contributor
|
LGTM |
spec_linux.go
Outdated
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe pluralize like the other fields?
This adds Go types implementing the configuration specification. Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <[email protected]>
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we get in opencontainers/runc#73 then might save the rename to sysctl after ;)
I can rebase later however :)
Contributor
|
LGTM |
mrunalp
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 2, 2015
Add Go types for specification
wking
added a commit
to wking/opencontainer-runtime-spec
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2017
It's backed by memory.oom_control, so this commit moves it in with the rest of the memory-controller config. Looking at the history, the initial request landing a setting for this in the Docker/OCI ecosystem seems to be [1], which added Cgroup.OomKillDisable. That commit was carried from libcontainer into runC [2] where it is now Resources.OomKillDisable [3]. From runC it was carried into this repo (with some renaming) in [4]. Subsequent early doc updates landed in [5,6]. In none of those can I find discussion about why the setting is not already under memory. I expect the reason is that the runC structures are flat, so "under memory" is not a thing there. But in this spec, resources has per-controller sub-properties. The fact that disableOOMKiller belonged to the memory controller may have been overlooked in [4] and never revisited until now. [1]: docker-archive/libcontainer#417 Subject: cgroups: add support for oom control [2]: opencontainers/runc@295c708 Subject: cgroups: add support for oom control [3]: https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/blob/v1.0.0-rc3/libcontainer/configs/cgroup_unix.go#L113-L114 [4]: opencontainers#51 Subject: Add Go types for specification [5]: opencontainers#137 Subject: Adding cgroups path to the Spec. [6]: opencontainers#199 Subject: runtime: config: linux: add cgroups informations Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds Go types implementing the configuration specification.
Closes #42
I also took the liberty to clean up the resource types because some of the names did not make sense at all and was pretty bad.
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby [email protected]