Skip to content

Conversation

@hqhq
Copy link
Contributor

@hqhq hqhq commented Nov 5, 2015

So users will always know the ID of the container.

Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang [email protected]

So users will always know the ID of the container.

Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <[email protected]>
@hqhq
Copy link
Contributor Author

hqhq commented Nov 5, 2015

Not sure if everyone want this, just a proposal to addresses #384 (comment)

@LK4D4
Copy link
Contributor

LK4D4 commented Nov 5, 2015

I can't say that I fan of this, it complicates stream handling.

@hqhq
Copy link
Contributor Author

hqhq commented Nov 5, 2015

@LK4D4 Yes that's also my concern, we should figure out a better way to handle container ID, especially we are merging #373 .

@mrunalp
Copy link
Contributor

mrunalp commented Nov 5, 2015

@hqhq Yes, I don't like this either. We shouldn't be polluting the stdout.

@mrunalp
Copy link
Contributor

mrunalp commented Nov 6, 2015

We should probably close this.

@hqhq
Copy link
Contributor Author

hqhq commented Nov 9, 2015

@mrunalp Yes, let's discuss this container ID problem in a separate issue.

@hqhq hqhq closed this Nov 9, 2015
@hqhq hqhq deleted the hq_output_id branch March 7, 2017 08:13
stefanberger pushed a commit to stefanberger/runc that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants