Skip to content

Conversation

@kolyshkin
Copy link
Contributor

@kolyshkin kolyshkin commented Apr 25, 2025

Let's prepare for v0.0.2 release. Here's a copy-paste of the changelog:

Changelog

This file documents all notable changes made to this project since it was
split out of runc repository.

The format is based on Keep a Changelog,
and this project adheres to Semantic Versioning.

Unreleased

0.0.2 - 2005-04-25

Added

Changed

Fixed

0.0.1 - 2025-02-28

Added

  • This is an initial release of the code after splitting it from the runc repository,
    according to the proposal.

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
# Changelog
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we even need to maintain CHANGELOG.md?
GitHub Releases have release notes

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but I'd like the information to be accessible locally. Maybe it's not worth it, I dunno.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I was considering the same. While a change-log can be nice, it also easily gets forgotten to be updated, or adds additional maintenance.

For a project that produces binaries (such as runc), I could see it being more relevant (also for potential inclusion in deb, rpm packages), but a bit on the fence for a library module like cgroups

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This kind of make sense. We can maintain the changelog under https://github.com/opencontainers/cgroups/releases

@kolyshkin kolyshkin closed this Apr 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants