Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spec compliance matrix: Add OTEL_SERVICE_NAME to C++ #3930

Conversation

marcalff
Copy link
Member

@marcalff marcalff commented Mar 7, 2024

Spec compliance matrix: Add OTEL_SERVICE_NAME to C++

Changes

Please provide a brief description of the changes here.

For non-trivial changes, follow the change proposal process.

@marcalff marcalff requested review from a team March 7, 2024 22:33
@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu merged commit e8d5e14 into open-telemetry:main Mar 8, 2024
7 checks passed
carlosalberto pushed a commit to carlosalberto/opentelemetry-specification that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
…3930)

Spec compliance matrix: Add OTEL_SERVICE_NAME to C++

## Changes

Please provide a brief description of the changes here.

For non-trivial changes, follow the [change proposal
process](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#proposing-a-change).

* [X] Related issues
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp#2577
* [ ] Related [OTEP(s)](https://github.com/open-telemetry/oteps) #
* [ ] Links to the prototypes (when adding or changing features)
* [ ]
[`CHANGELOG.md`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
file updated for non-trivial changes
* [X]
[`spec-compliance-matrix.md`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/spec-compliance-matrix.md)
updated if necessary

Co-authored-by: Bogdan Drutu <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants