Declare OTLP stable #3274
Declare OTLP stable #3274
Conversation
|
Can you also remove the "status" callouts in subsections since the whole document is marked stable? |
jonatan-ivanov
force-pushed
the
declare-otlp-stable
branch
from
b9b7770 to
24af291
Compare
|
👍🏼 I also removed the signal maturity level section. |
jonatan-ivanov
force-pushed
the
declare-otlp-stable
branch
from
24af291 to
f001eee
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Blocking this changes as, I think, there are some last conditions before we can declare OTLP stable as a whole: open-telemetry/opentelemetry-proto#400
@tigrannajaryan would you mind taking a look? Discard this changes request otherwise.
|
@carlosalberto Might worth putting a line or two in OTLP spec about why it is not stable yet if all of its components are declared as stable. |
|
This should be fine, I don't see anything that remains experimental. Let's not rush it though and give us time to think through. A question: do we have sufficiently clear understanding of what "Stable" means for this document or we need to spell it out explicitly? |
Since OTLP/JSON was declared stable, all the parts of the OTLP spec is stable so the whole spec should be declared as such See open-telemetrygh-2930 Signed-off-by: Jonatan Ivanov <[email protected]>
jonatan-ivanov
force-pushed
the
declare-otlp-stable
branch
from
f001eee to
63abbc5
Compare
|
@tigrannajaryan Can you bring this up in the next spec meeting to see what others think? |
|
@jonatan-ivanov Oh, definitely. |
Since OTLP/JSON was declared stable, all the parts of the OTLP spec is stable so the whole spec should be declared as such
See gh-2930