-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 599
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix auto-instrumentation dependency conflict detection #530
Fix auto-instrumentation dependency conflict detection #530
Conversation
f488345
to
6d3e4c5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix looks good, just one comment
|
||
|
||
def get_dependency_conflicts( | ||
deps: Collection[str], | ||
) -> Optional[DependencyConflict]: | ||
for dep in deps: | ||
try: | ||
get_distribution(str(dep)) | ||
get_distribution(dep) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it worth adding a catch all here to prevent any other exceptions from causing the script to exit unexpectedly?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could but I don't think there is anything too special about this and I expect it to work always unless in truly exceptional cases like the filesystem misbehaving or something like that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added an additional RequirementParseError that should catch most issues with invalid requirement strings being passed to this func.
return get_dependency_conflicts(deps) | ||
main_deps = dist.requires() | ||
instrumentation_deps = [] | ||
for dep in dist.requires(("instruments",)): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to clarify, this would generate the Requirements
for whatever is in extra_requires["instruments"]
IN ADDITION TO the regular install_requires
correct? In this case, the logic underneath will only parse through the ones that are not in the regualr install_requires
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correct. pkg_resource does not have an API to fetch only a specific extra require group. We could have used something like dist.requires(only_extra=('instruments',))
but it doesn't exist :)
|
||
|
||
def get_dependency_conflicts( | ||
deps: Collection[str], | ||
) -> Optional[DependencyConflict]: | ||
for dep in deps: | ||
try: | ||
get_distribution(str(dep)) | ||
get_distribution(dep) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What was the original issue behind this? get_distribution
behavior if the dep was not installed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It cannot parse requirement strings that might also contain markers (extra requires section name).
get_distribution("lib == 1.0")
works but get_distribution('lib == 1.0; extra = "instruments"')
does not.
b189239
to
eef7a13
Compare
eef7a13
to
efc735d
Compare
Description
Fixes #529
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration
Does This PR Require a Core Repo Change?
Checklist:
See contributing.md for styleguide, changelog guidelines, and more.