Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: warn user when a instrumented package was already required #636 #654

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 10, 2020

Conversation

vmarchaud
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 29, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #654 into master will decrease coverage by 34.53%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #654       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   91.11%   56.57%   -34.54%     
===========================================
  Files         232       77      -155     
  Lines       10444     1976     -8468     
  Branches      958      236      -722     
===========================================
- Hits         9516     1118     -8398     
+ Misses        928      858       -70
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...pentelemetry-core/src/platform/node/performance.ts 0% <0%> (-100%) ⬇️
...try-core/test/trace/fixtures/test-package/index.js 0% <0%> (-100%) ⬇️
...ry-api/test/noop-implementations/noop-span.test.ts 0% <0%> (-100%) ⬇️
...telemetry-core/test/platform/hex-to-base64.test.ts 0% <0%> (-100%) ⬇️
...-api/test/noop-implementations/noop-tracer.test.ts 0% <0%> (-100%) ⬇️
...st/trace/fixtures/test-package/foo/bar/internal.js 0% <0%> (-100%) ⬇️
...ntelemetry-core/src/platform/node/hex-to-base64.ts 0% <0%> (-88.89%) ⬇️
...ckages/opentelemetry-core/test/platform/id.test.ts 0% <0%> (-77.78%) ⬇️
...entelemetry-core/test/common/ConsoleLogger.test.ts 0% <0%> (-77.02%) ⬇️
...ntelemetry-core/test/trace/NoRecordingSpan.test.ts 0% <0%> (-71.43%) ⬇️
... and 170 more

@naseemkullah
Copy link
Member

As in #636 (comment)

Please confirm: the actual packages (http, express, redis, mysql, etc.) could indeed be required before tracer initialization, but they should be instantiated after the tracer initialization.

@vmarchaud vmarchaud force-pushed the warn-on-already-required branch from 5781dd0 to b8f5659 Compare January 1, 2020 16:50
@vmarchaud vmarchaud requested review from dyladan and markwolff January 1, 2020 16:50
@vmarchaud
Copy link
Member Author

vmarchaud commented Jan 1, 2020

I've adressed aboves comments

@vmarchaud vmarchaud force-pushed the warn-on-already-required branch 2 times, most recently from ed609f1 to d0b999b Compare January 5, 2020 12:24
@mayurkale22 mayurkale22 added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. needs-more-reviewers PRs with this label are ready for review and needs more people to review to move forward. labels Jan 6, 2020
@vmarchaud vmarchaud force-pushed the warn-on-already-required branch 3 times, most recently from 78a933b to 5bb0014 Compare January 11, 2020 16:30
@vmarchaud vmarchaud requested a review from mayurkale22 January 14, 2020 08:49
@vmarchaud
Copy link
Member Author

@open-telemetry/javascript-approvers Could we have more review on this one please ?

Copy link
Member

@obecny obecny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, have one question and I see possible room for performance improvements.

Copy link
Member

@dyladan dyladan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vmarchaud vmarchaud force-pushed the warn-on-already-required branch from fecdb2a to d431736 Compare January 26, 2020 10:38
@vmarchaud vmarchaud requested a review from dyladan January 26, 2020 10:38
@vmarchaud vmarchaud force-pushed the warn-on-already-required branch from 480b56e to 34bfa5c Compare February 1, 2020 10:33
@vmarchaud vmarchaud requested a review from dyladan February 1, 2020 10:33
Copy link
Member

@mayurkale22 mayurkale22 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, please fix the build for Node 10 and 12.

@mayurkale22 mayurkale22 added The CircleCI build failed and removed needs-more-reviewers PRs with this label are ready for review and needs more people to review to move forward. labels Feb 2, 2020
@vmarchaud vmarchaud force-pushed the warn-on-already-required branch from 9a0eb99 to 29e07e6 Compare February 8, 2020 13:13
@vmarchaud vmarchaud requested a review from dyladan February 8, 2020 13:18
@vmarchaud
Copy link
Member Author

i think this one is ready to be merged

@dyladan dyladan added the Merge:LGTM This PR is ready to be merged by a Maintainer (has enough valid approvals, successful build, etc.) label Feb 10, 2020
@mayurkale22 mayurkale22 merged commit b6a2ccd into open-telemetry:master Feb 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Merge:LGTM This PR is ready to be merged by a Maintainer (has enough valid approvals, successful build, etc.) size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants