feat(exporter-logs-otlp-http): implements otlp-http exporter for logs

[fuaiyi]

Which problem is this PR solving?

• exporter-logs-otlp-http

Short description of the changes

Implements otlp-http exporter for logs, support web and node. The implementation of Logs has been mentioned in #3442 before, but due to the large amount of code, it was split into SDK and Exporter parts. This is the implementation of the Exporter part.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

• Run the included unit tests.

Checklist:

• Followed the style guidelines of this project
• Unit tests have been added
• Documentation has been updated

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3764 (1fc2f76) into main (c6635fa) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 91.66%.

❗ Current head 1fc2f76 differs from pull request most recent head 24d2f52. Consider uploading reports for the commit 24d2f52 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3764      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.96%   92.95%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         295      297       +2     
  Lines        9036     9060      +24     
  Branches     1841     1848       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits         8400     8422      +22     
- Misses        636      638       +2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ogs-otlp-http/src/platform/node/OTLPLogExporter.ts	83.33% <83.33%> (ø)
...ges/exporter-logs-otlp-http/src/platform/config.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

[fuaiyi]

@dyladan @pichlermarc @martinkuba cc.
I'm so sorry that I've been a bit busy lately and didn't have time to submit this PR. It wasn't until yesterday when I saw that other contributor had already open a draft PR #3755

[dyladan]

@fuaiyi is this meant to replace #3755 or is it a competing alternative?

[dyladan]

Nevermind I just read the context in the other PR

[fuaiyi]

@fuaiyi is this meant to replace #3755 or is it a competing alternative?

@dyladan replace. I have contacted another contributor in #3755, and he/she will also make further contributions based on this PR. (Mainly considering that the development has actually been completed before, so there is no need to repeat it. #3755 also seems to have not been fully developed yet.

[dyladan]

Many failing CI steps

[fuaiyi]

Many failing CI steps

fixed, cc~

[pichlermarc]

Looks good, thanks 🙂
Just a few docs nits 🙂

[fuaiyi]

@dyladan take a look and see if can merge ?

[pichlermarc]

Reached out to Dan - Martin & my reviews should be sufficient. 🙂