feat: unify the signatures of bind and with

[rauno56]

Companion PR to open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js-api#78 for SDK changes.

[rauno56]

I think it would be better if we merge and release the API changes before reviewing this here.
Current changes should be sufficient, but the CI doesn't know that because I don't have a compatible API version to reference here.

cc: @open-telemetry/javascript-maintainers

[rauno56]

This is a draft I opened when I initially implemented bind/with changes, @dyladan.
You got ahead of me by merging most of the same changes, synced the branch and these are what was left from mine - some internal API changes.

Do you want to merge those as well? Close this PR if not.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2247 (4616497) into main (0141897) will increase coverage by 0.31%.
The diff coverage is 90.90%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2247      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.47%   92.79%   +0.31%     
==========================================
  Files         122      145      +23     
  Lines        4131     5216    +1085     
  Branches      858     1068     +210     
==========================================
+ Hits         3820     4840    +1020     
- Misses        311      376      +65     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...kages/opentelemetry-web/src/StackContextManager.ts	94.28% <66.66%> (ø)
...sync-hooks/src/AbstractAsyncHooksContextManager.ts	97.01% <100.00%> (ø)
...ry-context-zone-peer-dep/src/ZoneContextManager.ts	85.18% <100.00%> (ø)
...kages/opentelemetry-api-metrics/src/api/metrics.ts	90.90% <0.00%> (ø)
...ages/opentelemetry-api-metrics/src/types/Metric.ts	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...lemetry-exporter-collector/src/transformMetrics.ts	95.71% <0.00%> (ø)
...emetry-instrumentation-xml-http-request/src/xhr.ts	97.58% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/opentelemetry-web/src/utils.ts	94.80% <0.00%> (ø)
...kages/opentelemetry-exporter-collector/src/util.ts	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ages/opentelemetry-exporter-collector/src/types.ts	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 17 more

[dyladan]

Yes I think it should be unified and since this is internal methods it should be no problem. Please mark this as ready for review if it is ready.

[dyladan]

I see this is still a draft. Are you still working on this?

[rauno56]

Sorry. I've been on a holiday for a week. Let me take a quick check on Monday.

[rauno56]

I'm a bit lost with the error for node v16.

[dyladan]

Node 16 error was fixed in another PR please remove this

[rauno56]

Removed it!