Fix link checker

[jack-berg]

Build has been failing due to this for a while.

The link check config is meant to exclude links to issues / PRs for performance reasons, but this one slipped through the cracks.

Oddly though, if you navigate to #4775 you consistently get a 500 from github, despite it indeed being the correct link to the PR. To verify the correctness, you can separately search for that specific PR and click on it from the search results to get the same result!

Weird. Anyway, fixing it so its properly excluded 🤷

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.61%. Comparing base (d13f04d) to head (c7d881d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #7282   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     89.61%   89.61%           
  Complexity     6858     6858           
=========================================
  Files           780      780           
  Lines         20718    20718           
  Branches       2020     2020           
=========================================
  Hits          18566    18566           
  Misses         1512     1512           
  Partials        640      640           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[trask]

ah, I think the problem is that issue should be issues below, I wonder how many other repos I made that mistake in 🙈

(btw it seems weird that github issues plural but pull singular 🤷‍♂️)

opentelemetry-java/.github/workflows/reusable-markdown-link-check.yml

Line 20 in d13f04d

--exclude "^https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java/(issue|pull)/\\d+$"

[trask]

Oddly though, if you navigate to #4775 you consistently get a 500 from github, despite it indeed being the correct link to the PR. To verify the correctness, you can separately search for that specific PR and click on it from the search results to get the same result!

eek

[jack-berg]

(btw it seems weird that github issues plural but pull singular 🤷‍♂️)

Yeah that's terrible.

I pushed a commit to update it to plural in this repo.

[trask]

I pushed a link to update it to plural in this repo.

thanks, yeah, I'll go check other repos