Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert class names of pib and fsi targets for odyssey chips #83

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

devenrao
Copy link
Contributor

@devenrao devenrao commented Jan 9, 2024

At present class name of odyssey pib and fsi targets are set by appending "ody" to "pib" and "fsi" names to differntiate from ddr4 pib, fsi targets to ddr5 pib and fsi targets.

It was done to limit the search for the pib/fsi target of the odyssey chip when looping through all the pib and fsi target for the matching proc and ocmb target. Not much advantage though but done for clarity.

The change in class names for ody pib and fsi targets are failing in some of the sbe methods like sbe_set_state which are expecting old pib and fsi class names.

Change-Id: Ibe589b73e8561c33d2166af812cd4f25aa59078e

At present class name of odyssey pib and fsi targets are set
by appending "ody" to "pib" and "fsi" names to differntiate from
ddr4 pib, fsi targets to ddr5 pib and fsi targets.

It was done to limit the search for the pib/fsi target of the odyssey
chip when looping through all the pib and fsi target for the matching
proc and ocmb target. Not much advantage though but done for clarity.

The change in class names for ody pib and fsi targets are failing in
some of the sbe methods like sbe_set_state which are expecting
old pib and fsi class names.

Signed-off-by: Marri Devender Rao <[email protected]>
Change-Id: Ibe589b73e8561c33d2166af812cd4f25aa59078e
@devenrao devenrao closed this Jan 22, 2024
@devenrao devenrao deleted the ody branch January 22, 2024 12:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants