Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

schema: Include release date uniqueness definition in its description #1443

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 11, 2021

Conversation

yolile
Copy link
Member

@yolile yolile commented Nov 11, 2021

ref #848

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
},
"date": {
"title": "Release Date",
"description": "The date on which the information contained in the release was first recorded in, or published by, any system. For a compiled release, the maximum `date` among the individual releases used to create the compiled release.",
"description": "The date on which the information contained in the release was first recorded in, or published by, any system. The release date should be unique within the scope of the contracting process identified by the Open Contracting ID (ocid), for a given version of OCDS. For a compiled release, the maximum `date` among the individual releases used to create the compiled release.",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The part about the compiled release is not a full sentence - it's the alternative definition in case of a compiled release. So, I think it has to appear before the full sentence about uniqueness.

Suggested change
"description": "The date on which the information contained in the release was first recorded in, or published by, any system. The release date should be unique within the scope of the contracting process identified by the Open Contracting ID (ocid), for a given version of OCDS. For a compiled release, the maximum `date` among the individual releases used to create the compiled release.",
"description": "The date on which the information contained in the release was first recorded in, or published by, any system. For a compiled release, the maximum `date` among the individual releases used to create the compiled release. The release date should be unique within the scope of the contracting process identified by the Open Contracting ID (ocid), for a given version of OCDS.",

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

Also, does this close #848 or only ref it?

@yolile
Copy link
Member Author

yolile commented Nov 11, 2021

Also, does this close #848 or only ref it?

I'm not sure if we should close that issue or change it to OCDS 2.0 after we merge this one, as for OCDS 2.0 we may want to change the definition again from "should" to "must".

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

OCDS 2.0 has a lot of rules that might need to change, but we haven't started OCDS 2.0, so we don't need issues for those types of things yet.

@jpmckinney jpmckinney merged commit 809cd48 into 1.2-dev Nov 11, 2021
@jpmckinney jpmckinney deleted the 848-release-date-uniqueness branch November 11, 2021 20:44
@jpmckinney jpmckinney added this to the 1.2.0 milestone Jan 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants