Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add lots.submissionTerms.electronicSubmissionPolicy #47

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 14, 2023

Conversation

odscjen
Copy link
Contributor

@odscjen odscjen commented Dec 12, 2023

The test is failing I think because it's looking in core 1.1 for the field referenced by #/definitions/submissionTerms which has been added to 1.2-dev in open-contracting/standard#1654

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

I updated the tests, but the issue is that submissionTerms doesn't have a definition in OCDS 1.2. You'll have to make a PR there first, then reference it here.

@odscjen
Copy link
Contributor Author

odscjen commented Dec 14, 2023

Ah, yes I'd missed that the definition in 1.2 is in Tender rather than as a root. I'll make that PR to 1.2

@odscjen
Copy link
Contributor Author

odscjen commented Dec 14, 2023

open-contracting/standard#1667 should fix the issue

Copy link
Member

@jpmckinney jpmckinney left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to merge if suggestions applied.

@jpmckinney jpmckinney marked this pull request as ready for review December 14, 2023 16:18
@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

I fixed the comma as I also had to update the readme tests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants