Parties are referenced check: Export list of parties/roles which aren't referenced

[duncandewhurst]

In the parties are referenced check I can see that there 69,903 parties/roles which aren't referenced, but I can't see which parties/roles have the issue, e.g. is it always the 'payer' role or are there other roles which aren't referenced.

Ideally I'd like to be able to export a results table with the following columns:

ocid, parties/id, parties/roles, unreferenced role

(Edit: typo)

[jpmckinney]

Clicking on a few Previews, it seems to mostly be 'payer'. I see 'tenderer' also fails, because there are no references from tender/tenderers (though there are references from bids/details/tenderers).

We can perhaps consider an export as a tag in the reporting feature #6 @hrubyjan

[duncandewhurst]

Ah yes, this is similar to the requests in #6 (comment) and #6 (comment) to download a list of failures - but with more specific details on what the failure was exactly.

[hrubyjan]

@duncandewhurst @jpmckinney I think we have this problem only for two checks which aggregates the data for more objects of the same type. For Parties are referenced and Period's duration is consistent with start and end dates (see #59).

I think the easiest and most logical way how to deal with this problem is to decompose the two checks into 5 (6 respectively for #59) separate checks.

Then you'll see it like you see organization reference checks or role is set checks or role's name is consistent checks

So we'll have procuring entitty is referenced, tenderes are referenced, suppliers are referenced etc.... and you'll nicely see which role is not referenced properly (for #59 which period is problematic)

What do you think about it?

[jpmckinney]

That sounds good to me, and is consistent with the approach taken for other types of checks.

[duncandewhurst]

Sounds good to me!