chore(codeowners): Set codeowners for historical proofs work stream#163
Merged
chore(codeowners): Set codeowners for historical proofs work stream#163
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR updates the GitHub CODEOWNERS file to assign ownership of specific crates to a historical proofs work stream team. The changes replace the existing comprehensive codeowner assignments with a focused set of ownership rules for crates related to the historical proofs initiative.
- Replaces default global ownership and comprehensive per-crate assignments with targeted ownership for historical proofs work
- Assigns ownership of 8 specific crates to the historical proofs team (@dhyaniarun1993, @itschaindev, @sadiq1971, @meyer9, @emhane)
- Updates global default ownership to focus on the core historical proofs team members
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
dhyaniarun1993
approved these changes
Sep 25, 2025
meyer9
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2025
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
emhane
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2025
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
meyer9
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2025
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
emhane
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2025
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
meyer9
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2025
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
emhane
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2025
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
emhane
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
emhane
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2025
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
emhane
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
emhane
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2025
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
emhane
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2025
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
emhane
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2025
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
emhane
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2026
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
emhane
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2026
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
emhane
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2026
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
emhane
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 20, 2026
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
emhane
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2026
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
emhane
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2026
…163) @dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of _crates/optimism_, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder _crates/node_) level to achieve this.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@dhyaniarun1993 @itschaindev @sadiq1971 @meyer9 think these are the only crates we will need to touch. can update as we go. ideally the new logic will only live inside of crates/optimism, but we may need to generalise some components in the other crates I listed and make them customisable up at SDK (node builder crates/node) level to achieve this.