ci: open-code-review uses high reasoning effort, not max

[ojungo69]

The open-code-review workflow's model effort goes from max to high.

What

llm_reasoning_effort: max becomes high in both review steps, the primary model and the fallback. effort: high, the action's own review depth, was already high and is unchanged. Nothing else changes.

Note

The review job failed on the recent PRs (#205, #206 and #208: "The primary review failed and no fallback review succeeded"). Whether max caused that has not been checked. The workflow runs from main (pull_request_target), so this PR's own run still uses max. The new value applies to runs after the merge.

Review stop rule (declared before the first round)

A finding is fixed here only if it shows the workflow would fail, or would run with weaker permissions or trust than today. Everything else goes to an issue. After two rounds in a row whose findings all go to issues, or a 👍, this PR is merged with no further commit once check and CodeQL are green.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by Sourcery

Set the open-code-review workflow to use high reasoning effort for both configured models.

Enhancements:

• Reduce the model reasoning effort used by both the primary and fallback open-code-review models from maximum to high while retaining the workflow’s high review depth.

Documentation:

• Update open-code-review documentation to reflect the high model reasoning effort and revised timeout rationale.

[sourcery-ai]

Sorry @ojungo69, you've used your own review budget of 250,000 diff characters for the last 7 days.

You can request another review in 55 minutes by commenting @sourcery-ai review. Upgrade to get a review now.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for security reviews. Please try again later.

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 80b4843a-ea76-4341-b096-3ab19ff54da5

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-28T09:54:30.624325Z	21ba8ab	Manual request

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

The workflow now uses high rather than maximum LLM reasoning effort for both primary and fallback review models, addressing recent review-job failures while preserving permissions, timeouts, review depth, and other behavior.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Reduce the configured LLM reasoning effort from maximum to high for both the primary and fallback review paths.	Set the primary model's reasoning effort to high. Set the fallback model's reasoning effort to high. Leave the review action's separate effort: high depth setting and all other workflow configuration unchanged.	.github/workflows/open-code-review.yml

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3a4f55def5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery assessment

Approved.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[ojungo69]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for security reviews. Please try again later.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Swish!

Reviewed commit: 21ba8abfa2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

_{NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}