Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace custom useQuery util with TanStack useQuery #9360

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

amjithtitus09
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed Changes

  • Fixes #issue_number
  • Replaced custom useQuery util with tanStack useQuery, along with a wrapper for backward compatibility
  • Added documentation for tanStack usage as well as wrapper usage

@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers

Merge Checklist

  • Add specs that demonstrate bug / test a new feature.
  • Update product documentation.
  • Ensure that UI text is kept in I18n files.
  • Prep screenshot or demo video for changelog entry, and attach it to issue.
  • Request for Peer Reviews
  • Completion of QA

@amjithtitus09 amjithtitus09 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 10, 2024 20:15
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Important

Review skipped

More than 25% of the files skipped due to max files limit. The review is being skipped to prevent a low-quality review.

44 files out of 126 files are above the max files limit of 75. Please upgrade to Pro plan to get higher limits.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e447123
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/care-ohc/deploys/675a836cd4cbbe00082097d8
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-9360--care-ohc.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Member

@rithviknishad rithviknishad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This approach LGTM.

Just something to note, our request function does perform query retries by itself. And in this implementation Tanstack's Query Client has retry configured to 1.

We could modify our request to not perform retries.

for (let i = 0; i < reattempts + 1; i++) {

@rithviknishad rithviknishad added the Major Code Change This Tag represent PR, which will be causing major Code change in the platform label Dec 11, 2024
@rithviknishad
Copy link
Member

rithviknishad commented Dec 11, 2024

image

Since we have plugins, this approach isn't backwards compatible. We might have to stick with same file and function name useQuery instead of useTanstackQuery instead.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the merge conflict pull requests with merge conflict label Dec 11, 2024
Copy link

👋 Hi, @amjithtitus09,
Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch.


This message is automatically generated by prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action so don't hesitate to report issues/improvements there.

@rithviknishad rithviknishad removed the merge conflict pull requests with merge conflict label Dec 11, 2024
@rithviknishad
Copy link
Member

Looks like there's an issue with refetching when component remounts.

Example: when we go to asset list page, and open an asset and go back to asset list page using the back button, it shows no assets found.

…oute to ensure behaviour remains same as of previous impleemntation of useQuery
@rithviknishad
Copy link
Member

Opted out of caching between usages of the useQuery that has the same query key. This was causing so many weird state management issues with our existing implementation.

Cache for the same useQuery invocations is still present as per defaults.

@bodhish
Copy link
Member

bodhish commented Dec 12, 2024

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

@rithviknishad rithviknishad requested review from shivankacker, khavinshankar, Jacobjeevan and sainak and removed request for a team December 12, 2024 05:08
Copy link
Contributor

@Jacobjeevan Jacobjeevan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since we merged Users redesign FE yesterday, there's a few more instances of useQuery that ought to be replaced.

Other than that, LGTM.

@rithviknishad
Copy link
Member

Since we merged Users redesign FE yesterday, there's a few more instances of useQuery that ought to be replaced.

Done, thanks for finding that miss!

@rithviknishad rithviknishad merged commit 1fb976b into ohcnetwork:develop Dec 12, 2024
19 checks passed
Copy link

@rithviknishad @amjithtitus09 Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Done Major Code Change This Tag represent PR, which will be causing major Code change in the platform
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants