Refactored Location Management Cypress Test #9301
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve significant modifications to the Cypress end-to-end test files related to facility creation and location management. Key updates include the removal of the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Deploying care-fe with
|
| Latest commit: |
fb1d9eb
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://0e38543c.care-fe.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://location-manage-test.care-fe.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (2)
Line range hint
87-90: Correct method name spelling forverifyAddLocationSuccessfulMessageThe method
verifyAddLocationSuccessfulMesssagehas an extra 's' in 'Message'. This typo could cause issues when invoking the method.Apply this diff to correct the method name:
- verifyAddLocationSuccessfulMesssage() { + verifyAddLocationSuccessfulMessage() { cy.verifyNotification("Location created successfully"); cy.closeNotification(); }Ensure all calls to this method are updated accordingly.
102-105: Correct method name spelling forverifyAddSingleBedSuccessfulMessageThe method
verifyAddSingleBedSuccessfulMesssagehas an extra 's' in 'Message'. This typo could lead to errors when the method is called.Apply this diff to correct the method name:
- verifyAddSingleBedSuccessfulMesssage() { + verifyAddSingleBedSuccessfulMessage() { cy.verifyNotification("1 Bed created successfully"); cy.closeNotification(); }Update all references to this method accordingly.
cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityLocation.ts (4)
14-16: Review the necessity of bothtypeLocationNameandenterLocationNamemethodsHaving both
typeLocationNameandenterLocationNamemethods might be redundant and could cause confusion. Consider consolidating them into a single method.Optionally, merge these methods to improve code maintainability:
- typeLocationName(locationName: string) { - cy.get("#location-name").type(locationName); - } ... enterLocationName(name: string) { - cy.get("input[id=name]").type(name); + cy.get("#location-name").type(name); }Update all references to use the consolidated method.
87-90: Correct method name spelling forverifyAddLocationSuccessfulMessageAs mentioned earlier, correct the spelling of
verifyAddLocationSuccessfulMesssagetoverifyAddLocationSuccessfulMessage.Apply this diff:
- verifyAddLocationSuccessfulMesssage() { + verifyAddLocationSuccessfulMessage() { cy.verifyNotification("Location created successfully"); cy.closeNotification(); }
97-100: Ensure consistency in method namingConfirm that all success message verification methods follow a consistent naming convention, such as using
verify<Action><Entity>SuccessfulMessage.This enhances readability and maintainability of the code.
164-165: SimplifyclickDeleteLocationmethodThe
clickDeleteLocationmethod usescy.verifyAndClickElement, which checks for visibility before clicking. Ensure that this is necessary, or consider simplifying if not required.If visibility checks are redundant, you might simplify the method:
clickDeleteLocation() { - cy.verifyAndClickElement("#delete-location-button", "Delete"); + cy.get("#delete-location-button").click(); }cypress/support/commands.ts (1)
233-243: Enhance error handling inverifyErrorMessagescommandThe
verifyErrorMessagescommand effectively checks for expected error messages. However, consider handling cases where the.error-textelements are not found, which could lead to false positives.You might add an assertion to ensure that error elements are present:
cy.get(selector).should('exist').then(($errors) => { const displayedErrorMessages = $errors .map((_, el) => Cypress.$(el).text()) .get(); errorMessages.forEach((errorMessage) => { expect(displayedErrorMessages).to.include(errorMessage); }); });This ensures the command fails appropriately when no error messages are displayed.
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts (2)
124-124: LGTM with a suggestion for error message constantsThe error verification is correctly implemented. Consider moving the error message arrays to a separate constants file for better maintainability and reuse across tests.
Example structure:
// cypress/fixtures/errorMessages.ts export const FACILITY_FORM_ERRORS = { EMPTY_FORM: [ "Required", "Required", "Invalid Pincode", // ... rest of the messages ], // ... other error message groups };
Line range hint
1-424: Consider improving test organization and constantsThe test file is well-structured with comprehensive coverage of facility creation scenarios. To further improve maintainability:
- Consider extracting test data and error messages to fixture files
- Group related test scenarios using
contextblocks- Consider adding data-testid attributes for more reliable selectors
Example structure:
// Group related scenarios context('Facility Creation - Happy Path', () => { it('with multiple bed and doctor capacity', () => {...}); it('with single bed and doctor capacity', () => {...}); }); context('Facility Creation - Error Cases', () => { it('with no bed and doctor capacity', () => {...}); it('with different district', () => {...}); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts(3 hunks)cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts(5 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityHome.ts(0 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityLocation.ts(4 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts(0 hunks)cypress/support/commands.ts(1 hunks)cypress/support/index.ts(1 hunks)src/components/Facility/AddLocationForm.tsx(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts
- cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityHome.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts (2)
Learnt from: kihan2518B
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8956
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:261-261
Timestamp: 2024-12-04T18:58:47.241Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, the test case titled "Create a new facility with no bed and doctor capacity" includes steps to select bed types and specializations before validation. This is done intentionally to verify that error messages are shown properly when no capacity is specified.
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:177-180
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:44:30.303Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, when testing bed and staff capacity individually for additional error verification, we prefer to use separate method calls to handle bed and staff capacity, rather than using `facilityPage.createNewFacility(testFacilityData)` which also handles bed management.
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (3)
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:177-180
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:44:30.303Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, when testing bed and staff capacity individually for additional error verification, we prefer to use separate method calls to handle bed and staff capacity, rather than using `facilityPage.createNewFacility(testFacilityData)` which also handles bed management.
Learnt from: kihan2518B
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8956
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:261-261
Timestamp: 2024-12-04T18:58:47.241Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, the test case titled "Create a new facility with no bed and doctor capacity" includes steps to select bed types and specializations before validation. This is done intentionally to verify that error messages are shown properly when no capacity is specified.
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts:229-317
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:46:56.271Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts`, when verifying the bed capacity badge reflection, the badge remains the same during multiple actions and only updates after a bed is attached to a patient during consultation. Therefore, it's appropriate to keep the test case consolidated rather than splitting it into smaller tests.
🔇 Additional comments (9)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (4)
92-95: Correct method name spelling for verifyEditBedSuccessfulMessage
Similar to the previous comment, the method verifyEditBedSuccessfulMessage is correctly spelled here, but double-check for consistency across the codebase.
Please ensure that all method names are consistently spelled throughout the codebase.
97-100: Correct method name spelling for verifyEditLocationSuccessfulMessage
The method name is correctly spelled here. Just confirm consistency across all method calls.
83-83: Ensure proper method call after submitting bed
After calling facilityLocation.clickSubmitBedsButton(), ensure that verifyAddSingleBedSuccessfulMessage() is called with the corrected method name.
Double-check that the method verifyAddSingleBedSuccessfulMessage() is called to verify the successful addition of a bed.
Line range hint 243-243: Verify error handling in verifyErrorMessages command
Ensure that the verifyErrorMessages command correctly handles scenarios where expected error messages are not displayed, providing useful feedback for test failures.
Consider adding assertions or additional logging in case of missing error messages to aid in debugging test failures.
cypress/support/index.ts (1)
48-48: Add new method to Chainable interface for error message verification
The addition of verifyErrorMessages(errorMessages: string[]): Chainable<Subject>; extends the Chainable interface appropriately.
src/components/Facility/AddLocationForm.tsx (1)
165-165: Ensure consistent id attributes for form fields
The addition of id="location-name" to the TextFormField improves accessibility and facilitates testing. Ensure that all form fields have consistent and meaningful id attributes.
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts (3)
88-88: LGTM: Simplified error message verification
The change to use cy.verifyErrorMessages() custom command improves code maintainability by centralizing error message verification logic.
271-271: LGTM: Intentional validation of bed capacity errors
The error verification is correctly implemented and aligns with the test's intention to validate empty bed capacity form submission.
276-276: LGTM: Verify custom command implementation
The error verification is correctly implemented. Let's verify the custom command implementation to ensure consistent behavior.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the implementation of the custom command to ensure it's properly defined.
LGTM: Custom command implementation is correct and consistent
The cy.verifyErrorMessages command is properly implemented to check error messages using the .error-text selector. The command is used consistently across facility tests to verify various error scenarios including bed, doctor, triage, and location validations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of cy.verifyErrorMessages custom command
# Search for the custom command definition
echo "Searching for verifyErrorMessages command definition..."
rg -l "Cypress.Commands.add.*verifyErrorMessages" cypress/support/
# Search for all usages of the command
echo "Searching for all usages of verifyErrorMessages..."
rg "cy\.verifyErrorMessages" cypress/e2e/
Length of output: 976
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the implementation of verifyErrorMessages command
echo "Content of commands.ts:"
cat cypress/support/commands.ts
Length of output: 7237
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it("Delete location with linked assets", () => { | ||
| const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix syntax error in locationName constant
There is an extra closing curly brace }} in the template string for locationName.
Apply this diff to correct the constant:
- const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`;
+ const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`; | |
| const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`; |
| const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`; | ||
| const locationModifiedName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix syntax error in locationName and locationModifiedName constants
Similar to the previous issue, there are extra closing curly braces }} in the template strings for locationName and locationModifiedName.
Apply this diff to correct the constants:
- const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`;
+ const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`;
- const locationModifiedName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`;
+ const locationModifiedName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`; | |
| const locationModifiedName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`; | |
| const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`; | |
| const locationModifiedName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`; |
| const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`; | ||
| const facilityName = "Dummy Facility 12"; | ||
| const bedName = `Bed-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`; | ||
| // Select a new facility |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix syntax error in locationName and bedName constants
Again, there are extra closing curly braces }} in the template strings for locationName and bedName.
Apply this diff to correct the constants:
- const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`;
+ const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`;
- const bedName = `Bed-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`;
+ const bedName = `Bed-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`; | |
| const facilityName = "Dummy Facility 12"; | |
| const bedName = `Bed-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`; | |
| // Select a new facility | |
| const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`; | |
| const facilityName = "Dummy Facility 12"; | |
| const bedName = `Bed-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`; | |
| // Select a new facility |
| const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`; | ||
| const facilityName = "Dummy Request Fulfilment Center"; | ||
| const bedName = `Bed-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`; | ||
| const duplicateBedName = `Duplicate-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix syntax errors in template strings
The constants locationName, bedName, duplicateBedName, and multipleBedName have an extra closing curly brace }} in their template strings, which will cause a syntax error.
Apply this diff to correct the template strings:
- const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`;
+ const locationName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`;
- const bedName = `Bed-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`;
+ const bedName = `Bed-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`;
- const duplicateBedName = `Duplicate-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`;
+ const duplicateBedName = `Duplicate-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`;
- const multipleBedName = `Multi-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`;
+ const multipleBedName = `Multi-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`;Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| facilityLocation.enterLocationName(locationName); | ||
| facilityLocation.selectLocationType(locationType); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure consistent use of selector in enterLocationName method
The enterLocationName method uses the selector cy.get("input[id=name]"), which may not match the updated id in the form. Based on changes in the form component, the input field for the location name now has id="location-name". Update the selector to reflect this change.
Apply this diff to update the selector:
enterLocationName(name: string) {
- cy.get("input[id=name]").type(name);
+ cy.get("#location-name").type(name);
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| facilityLocation.clickAddNewLocationButton(); | ||
| facilityLocation.typeLocationName(locationName); | ||
| facilityLocation.selectLocationType(locationType); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve method usage consistency
You're using facilityLocation.typeLocationName(locationName) to enter the location name. However, in other parts of the code, you're using enterLocationName. For consistency and to avoid confusion, consider using a single method for entering the location name.
Apply this diff to standardize the method:
- facilityLocation.typeLocationName(locationName);
+ facilityLocation.enterLocationName(locationName);Alternatively, update the method in the FacilityLocation class to keep typeLocationName and remove enterLocationName.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
CARE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
CARE
|
| Branch Review |
location-manage-test
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 05m 16s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Mohammed Nihal |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
144
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (4)
Line range hint
19-24: Consider moving test data to a separate fixture fileThe error message constants could be moved to a separate fixture file to improve maintainability and reusability across tests.
Create a new file
cypress/fixtures/errorMessages.ts:export const LOCATION_ERROR_MESSAGES = [ "Name is required", "Location Type is required", ]; export const BED_ERROR_MESSAGES = [ "Please enter a name", "Please select a bed type", ];
Line range hint
54-119: Consider splitting the test case into smaller, focused testsThis test case handles multiple scenarios: single bed creation, bed duplication, bed editing, and multiple bed creation. Consider splitting it into separate test cases for better maintainability and clarity:
- "Add single bed and verify error messages"
- "Verify bed duplication handling"
- "Edit existing bed"
- "Create multiple beds and verify pagination"
151-154: Verify notification message contentConsider adding an assertion to verify the exact content of the notification message matches the expected error message.
const DUPLICATE_LOCATION_ERROR = "Name - Asset location with this name and facility already exists."; cy.verifyNotification(DUPLICATE_LOCATION_ERROR).should('have.text', DUPLICATE_LOCATION_ERROR);
Line range hint
230-248: Move asset creation to a custom commandConsider moving the asset creation logic to a custom command to improve reusability and reduce test complexity.
Create a new command in
cypress/support/commands.ts:Cypress.Commands.add('createLinkedAsset', (facilityName: string, locationName: string, assetDetails: AssetDetails) => { assetPage.createAsset(); assetPage.selectFacility(facilityName); assetPage.selectLocation(locationName); assetPage.enterAssetDetails( assetDetails.name, assetDetails.description, assetDetails.status, assetDetails.qrId, assetDetails.manufacturer, assetDetails.warrantyExpiry, assetDetails.supportName, assetDetails.supportPhone, assetDetails.supportEmail, assetDetails.vendorName, assetDetails.serialNumber, assetDetails.purchaseDate, assetDetails.note ); assetPage.clickassetupdatebutton(); });Then use it in the test:
cy.createLinkedAsset(facilityName, locationName, { name: "Test Asset linked to Facility", description: "Test Description", status: "Working", qrId: qr_id_1, manufacturer: "Manufacturer's Name", warrantyExpiry: "2025-12-25", supportName: "Customer Support's Name", supportPhone: phone_number, supportEmail: "[email protected]", vendorName: "Vendor's Name", serialNumber: serialNumber, purchaseDate: "25122021", note: "Test note for asset creation!" });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (3)
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:177-180
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:44:30.303Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, when testing bed and staff capacity individually for additional error verification, we prefer to use separate method calls to handle bed and staff capacity, rather than using `facilityPage.createNewFacility(testFacilityData)` which also handles bed management.
Learnt from: kihan2518B
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8956
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:261-261
Timestamp: 2024-12-04T18:58:47.241Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, the test case titled "Create a new facility with no bed and doctor capacity" includes steps to select bed types and specializations before validation. This is done intentionally to verify that error messages are shown properly when no capacity is specified.
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts:229-317
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:46:56.271Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts`, when verifying the bed capacity badge reflection, the badge remains the same during multiple actions and only updates after a bed is attached to a patient during consultation. Therefore, it's appropriate to keep the test case consolidated rather than splitting it into smaller tests.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (2)
59-59:
Fix syntax error in template string
There's an extra closing brace in the template string.
- const multipleBedName = `Multi-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`;
+ const multipleBedName = `Multi-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
123-123:
Fix syntax error in template string
There's an extra closing brace in the template string.
- const locationModifiedName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`;
+ const locationModifiedName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/components/Facility/LocationManagement.tsx (1)
242-245: Consider making the id more specificThe addition of the
idattribute improves accessibility and testability. However, since this is a list item representing a single location card, consider making the id more specific by including the location's id:<div className="flex h-full w-full flex-col rounded border border-secondary-300 bg-white p-6 shadow-sm transition-all duration-200 ease-in-out hover:border-primary-400" - id="location-cards" + id={`location-card-${id}`} >This would:
- Make each location card uniquely identifiable
- Make it easier to target specific locations in tests
- Follow a more semantic naming convention
cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityLocation.ts (1)
184-190: Add response verification to bed deletion.The
deleteBedWithNamemethod should verify the deletion was successful.Consider adding response verification by using the existing
deleteBedRequestanddeleteBedResponsemethods:deleteBedWithName(text: string) { + this.deleteBedRequest(); cy.get("#bed-card") .contains(text) .parents("#bed-card") .within(() => { cy.get("#delete-bed-button").click(); }); + this.deleteBedResponse(); }cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (1)
Line range hint
19-24: Consider using fixtures for error messages.Error messages are currently hardcoded in the test file. Consider moving them to a fixture file for better maintainability.
Create a fixture file
cypress/fixtures/errorMessages.json:{ "location": { "name": "Name is required", "type": "Location Type is required" }, "bed": { "name": "Please enter a name", "type": "Please select a bed type" } }Then update the test file to use the fixture:
let errorMessages: any; before(() => { cy.fixture('errorMessages').then((messages) => { errorMessages = messages; }); loginPage.loginByRole("districtAdmin"); cy.saveLocalStorage(); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts(5 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityLocation.ts(4 hunks)src/components/Facility/BedManagement.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Facility/LocationManagement.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/components/Facility/BedManagement.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (3)
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:177-180
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:44:30.303Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, when testing bed and staff capacity individually for additional error verification, we prefer to use separate method calls to handle bed and staff capacity, rather than using `facilityPage.createNewFacility(testFacilityData)` which also handles bed management.
Learnt from: kihan2518B
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8956
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:261-261
Timestamp: 2024-12-04T18:58:47.241Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, the test case titled "Create a new facility with no bed and doctor capacity" includes steps to select bed types and specializations before validation. This is done intentionally to verify that error messages are shown properly when no capacity is specified.
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts:229-317
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:46:56.271Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts`, when verifying the bed capacity badge reflection, the badge remains the same during multiple actions and only updates after a bed is attached to a patient during consultation. Therefore, it's appropriate to keep the test case consolidated rather than splitting it into smaller tests.
cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityLocation.ts (1)
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:177-180
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:44:30.303Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, when testing bed and staff capacity individually for additional error verification, we prefer to use separate method calls to handle bed and staff capacity, rather than using `facilityPage.createNewFacility(testFacilityData)` which also handles bed management.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityLocation.ts (2)
8-13: LGTM! Well-structured navigation method.
The navigateToFacilityLocationManagement method provides a clear and reusable way to navigate to the facility location management section.
103-116: LGTM! Well-structured success message verification methods.
The success message verification methods follow a consistent pattern:
- Verify the notification message
- Close the notification
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (3)
Line range hint 167-275: LGTM! Well-structured deletion test cases.
The test cases for location deletion:
- Cover both linked beds and assets scenarios
- Follow a clear pattern of setup, action, and verification
- Include proper cleanup
119-119:
Fix syntax error in template string.
There's an extra closing curly brace in the template string for locationModifiedName.
Apply this diff to fix the syntax error:
-const locationModifiedName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`;
+const locationModifiedName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
59-59:
Fix syntax error in template string.
There's an extra closing curly brace in the template string for multipleBedName.
Apply this diff to fix the syntax error:
-const multipleBedName = `Multi-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`;
+const multipleBedName = `Multi-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-215: Consider architectural improvements for better maintainability.The test suite could benefit from the following improvements:
- Extract repeated setup code (like filter selections) into shared helper functions
- Move magic strings (like "Dummy Facility 40", error messages) to a constants file
- Split the test file into smaller, more focused files (e.g., separate files for facility search, notifications, exports)
- Follow the single responsibility principle for test cases (e.g., separate facility details navigation from live monitoring tests)
Would you like me to provide specific examples of how to implement these improvements?
cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityLocation.ts (1)
16-26: Consider adding a TypeScript interface for location details.The method is well-structured with optional parameters, but could benefit from a dedicated interface to improve type safety and documentation.
interface LocationDetails { name?: string; description?: string; type?: string; middleware?: string; } fillLocationDetails(details: LocationDetails) { if (details.name) this.typeLocationName(details.name); if (details.description) this.fillDescription(details.description); if (details.type) this.selectLocationType(details.type); if (details.middleware) this.fillMiddlewareAddress(details.middleware); }cypress/pageobject/Asset/AssetCreation.ts (1)
35-81: Consider using a parameter object pattern for better maintainability.The method has many optional parameters which could be better organized using a parameter object pattern.
interface AssetDetails { name?: string; description?: string; workingStatus?: string; qrId?: string; manufacturer?: string; warranty?: string; support?: { name?: string; phone?: string; email?: string; }; vendor?: { name?: string; }; serialNumber?: string; lastServicedOn?: string; notes?: string; } enterAssetDetails(details: AssetDetails) { if (details.name) cy.get("[data-testid=asset-name-input] input").type(details.name); if (details.description) cy.get("[data-testid=asset-description-input] textarea").type(details.description); // ... rest of the implementation }cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (2)
59-64: Consider removing undefined parameters for better readability.The
fillLocationDetailscall includes multipleundefinedparameters that could be omitted if the method supports default parameters.-facilityLocation.fillLocationDetails( - locationName, - undefined, - locationType, - undefined, -); +facilityLocation.fillLocationDetails(locationName, null, locationType);
51-278: Consider extracting common test patterns into helper functions.The test cases share common patterns for:
- Location creation and cleanup
- Bed creation and cleanup
- Asset creation and cleanup
Consider creating helper functions to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
Example helper function:
const createAndVerifyLocation = (facilityName: string, locationName: string, locationType: string) => { facilityLocation.navigateToFacilityLocationManagement(facilityName); facilityLocation.clickAddNewLocationButton(); facilityLocation.fillLocationDetails(locationName, null, locationType); facilityLocation.clickAddLocationButton(); facilityLocation.verifyAddLocationSuccessfulMesssage(); };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts(3 hunks)cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersCreation.cy.ts(2 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Asset/AssetCreation.ts(1 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityLocation.ts(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityLocation.ts (1)
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:177-180
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:44:30.303Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, when testing bed and staff capacity individually for additional error verification, we prefer to use separate method calls to handle bed and staff capacity, rather than using `facilityPage.createNewFacility(testFacilityData)` which also handles bed management.
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (1)
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:177-180
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:44:30.303Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, when testing bed and staff capacity individually for additional error verification, we prefer to use separate method calls to handle bed and staff capacity, rather than using `facilityPage.createNewFacility(testFacilityData)` which also handles bed management.
🔇 Additional comments (10)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts (2)
183-185: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve test reliability by avoiding fixed waits.
The cy.wait(2000) before closing the modal could lead to flaky tests. Instead:
- Wait for specific UI elements or network requests to complete
- Use Cypress's built-in retry-ability and assertions
Replace the fixed wait with a more reliable approach:
- cy.wait(2000);
- cy.clickCancelButton("Cancel");
+ // Wait for the notification to be fully displayed
+ cy.get('.notification').should('be.visible');
+ // Ensure the modal is in a closeable state
+ cy.get('.modal-dialog').should('be.visible')
+ .and('not.have.class', 'loading');
+ cy.clickCancelButton("Cancel");
+ // Verify the modal is actually closed
+ cy.get('.modal-dialog').should('not.exist');Likely invalid or redundant comment.
184-184: LGTM! Consider standardizing other modal interactions.
The change to use cy.clickCancelButton("Cancel") is a good improvement as it:
- Uses a standardized Cypress command for modal interactions
- Makes the test more maintainable and readable
- Reduces dependency on page object methods
Let's verify if there are other modal interactions that could be standardized:
✅ Verification successful
Modal interaction standardization is already in progress
The change to use cy.clickCancelButton() is part of an ongoing standardization effort:
- The command is properly implemented in
cypress/support/commands.tswith a consistent approach - It's already being used in multiple places: HcxClaims, FacilityHomepage, and FacilityLocation
- The remaining modal interactions in FacilityNotify are for different operations (input/verification) rather than modal dismissal
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential modal interaction patterns that could be standardized
rg -l 'verifyAndCloseNotifyModal|closeModal|dismissModal' 'cypress/e2e' 'cypress/pageobject'
# Search for existing usage of clickCancelButton to ensure consistency
rg 'cy\.clickCancelButton' 'cypress/e2e' 'cypress/pageobject'
Length of output: 384
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for modal-related patterns in the codebase to understand the full context
rg -A 3 'verifyAndCloseNotifyModal|closeModal|dismissModal|Modal\.close|Modal\.dismiss' 'cypress/e2e' 'cypress/pageobject'
# Also search for any custom commands related to modal interactions
rg -A 3 'Cypress\.Commands\.add.*[Mm]odal' 'cypress/support'
Length of output: 181
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for modal-related code
rg -A 3 -i 'modal' 'cypress/pageobject' 'cypress/e2e'
# Also search for the implementation of clickCancelButton command
rg -A 3 'clickCancelButton' 'cypress/support'
Length of output: 1441
cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityLocation.ts (2)
8-14: LGTM! Well-structured navigation method.
The method effectively encapsulates the navigation steps using page object methods, improving code reusability and maintainability.
113-120: LGTM! Well-implemented bed management interaction.
The method properly scopes the element selection using within() and uses clear selectors.
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersCreation.cy.ts (1)
139-139: LGTM! Good migration to custom Cypress commands.
The change from page object method to custom Cypress command cy.verifyErrorMessages improves consistency and follows Cypress best practices.
Also applies to: 180-180
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (5)
Line range hint 1-40: LGTM! Well-structured test setup.
The import statements are properly organized, and the test setup includes appropriate viewport configuration and localStorage management.
122-127: Consider removing undefined parameters for better readability.
Similar to the previous test, the fillLocationDetails call includes unnecessary undefined parameters.
160-160:
Fix syntax error in template string.
There's an extra closing brace in the template string for locationModifiedName.
-const locationModifiedName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`;
+const locationModifiedName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
217-217:
Fix syntax error in template string.
There's an extra closing brace in the template string for multipleBedName.
-const multipleBedName = `Multi-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`;
+const multipleBedName = `Multi-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
275-278: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Verify the number of beds created.
The test creates multiple beds but doesn't verify if all beds were created successfully. Consider adding verification for the number of beds.
facilityLocation.clickSubmitBedsButton();
+// Verify all beds were created
+cy.get('[data-testid="bed-card"]').should('have.length', numberOfBeds);
// Verify Pagination in the page
pageNavigation.navigateToNextPage();
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (1)
78-79: Consider using assetPage method for notification verification.For consistency with other asset-related operations, consider encapsulating the notification verification within the AssetPage class.
-cy.verifyNotification("Asset created successfully"); -cy.closeNotification(); +assetPage.verifySuccessNotification("Asset created successfully");
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
cypress/e2e/assets_spec/AssetsCreation.cy.ts(3 hunks)cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts(3 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Asset/AssetCreation.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (1)
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:177-180
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:44:30.303Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, when testing bed and staff capacity individually for additional error verification, we prefer to use separate method calls to handle bed and staff capacity, rather than using `facilityPage.createNewFacility(testFacilityData)` which also handles bed management.
🔇 Additional comments (8)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (6)
Line range hint 1-37: LGTM! Clean import structure and well-organized constants.
The imports are properly organized and the test constants are well-defined with clear, descriptive names.
51-102: LGTM! Well-structured test with proper cleanup.
The test thoroughly verifies the business logic for location deletion with linked assets, including proper setup and cleanup steps.
104-145: LGTM! Well-implemented test for bed-related constraints.
The test properly verifies location deletion constraints when beds are present, with appropriate setup and cleanup steps.
202-268: LGTM! Comprehensive bed management test.
The test thoroughly covers all aspects of bed management including single bed creation, multiple beds, duplication handling, and pagination.
150-150:
Fix syntax error in template string.
There's an extra closing brace in the template string for locationModifiedName.
-const locationModifiedName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`;
+const locationModifiedName = `ICU-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
207-207:
Fix syntax error in template string.
There's an extra closing brace in the template string for multipleBedName.
-const multipleBedName = `Multi-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}}`;
+const multipleBedName = `Multi-${uuidv4().substring(0, 2)}`;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
cypress/pageobject/Asset/AssetCreation.ts (1)
34-95: LGTM! Well-structured refactor of enterAssetDetails method.
The refactoring to use an object parameter with optional properties improves code maintainability and readability. The implementation properly handles conditional typing of each field.
cypress/e2e/assets_spec/AssetsCreation.cy.ts (1)
Line range hint 46-156: LGTM! Properly updated to use new enterAssetDetails structure.
The test cases have been correctly updated to use the new object parameter structure for enterAssetDetails, maintaining consistency throughout the file.
| enterAssetDetails({ | ||
| name, | ||
| description, | ||
| workingStatus, | ||
| qrId, | ||
| manufacturer, | ||
| warranty, | ||
| supportName, | ||
| supportPhone, | ||
| supportEmail, | ||
| vendorName, | ||
| serialNumber, | ||
| lastServicedOn, | ||
| notes, | ||
| }: { | ||
| name?: string; | ||
| description?: string; | ||
| workingStatus?: string; | ||
| qrId?: string; | ||
| manufacturer?: string; | ||
| warranty?: string; | ||
| supportName?: string; | ||
| supportPhone?: string; | ||
| supportEmail?: string; | ||
| vendorName?: string; | ||
| serialNumber?: string; | ||
| lastServicedOn?: string; | ||
| notes?: string; | ||
| }) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would be better to separate out the type, so it could be reused something like AssetCreateForm.
This can be done later too when needed.
|
@nihal467 Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌 |
Proposed Changes
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
idattributes for form fields and elements.Bug Fixes