Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 1, 2022. It is now read-only.

fix: use inclusive terms #178

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2020
Merged

fix: use inclusive terms #178

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2020

Conversation

chadian
Copy link
Contributor

@chadian chadian commented Jun 30, 2020

This pull request removes terms that are not inclusive.

Copy link
Contributor

@RasPhilCo RasPhilCo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🏄

@chadian chadian merged commit b151545 into master Jul 2, 2020
oclif-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2020
## [5.4.7](v5.4.6...v5.4.7) (2020-07-02)

### Bug Fixes

* smaller bundle size, cut lodash imports ([#107](#107)) ([41cdbc7](41cdbc7))
* use inclusive terms ([#178](#178)) ([b151545](b151545))
@RasPhilCo RasPhilCo deleted the use-inclusive-terms branch July 2, 2020 18:29
oclif-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2020
## [5.4.7](v5.4.6...v5.4.7) (2020-07-02)

### Bug Fixes

* smaller bundle size, cut lodash imports ([#107](#107)) ([41cdbc7](41cdbc7))
* use inclusive terms ([#178](#178)) ([b151545](b151545))
oclif-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2020
## [5.4.7](v5.4.6...v5.4.7) (2020-07-02)

### Bug Fixes

* smaller bundle size, cut lodash imports ([#107](#107)) ([41cdbc7](41cdbc7))
* use inclusive terms ([#178](#178)) ([b151545](b151545))
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants