Ipfs test suite#12
Merged
Ericson2314 merged 21 commits intoipfs-binary-cache-developfrom Jun 13, 2020
Merged
Conversation
…s/nix into cn-test-suite-automatization
Eventually we should separate test deps.
Not sure what this `nix copy` problem is. I'm pretty sure it's a preexistsing bug.
The test infra will handle NIX_REMOTE
This reverts commit 5352bcb.
Ericson2314
approved these changes
Jun 13, 2020
Ericson2314
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 23, 2020
This deadlocks ProgressBar, e.g.
# nix run --impure --no-substitute --store '/tmp/nix2?store=/foo' --expr 'derivation { builder = /nix/store/zi90rxslsm4mlr46l2xws1rm94g7pk8p-busybox-1.31.1-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl/bin/busybox; }'
leads to
Thread 1 (Thread 0x7ffff6126e80 (LWP 12250)):
#0 0x00007ffff7215d62 in __lll_lock_wait () from /nix/store/9df65igwjmf2wbw0gbrrgair6piqjgmi-glibc-2.31/lib/libpthread.so.0
#1 0x00007ffff720e721 in pthread_mutex_lock () from /nix/store/9df65igwjmf2wbw0gbrrgair6piqjgmi-glibc-2.31/lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 0x00007ffff7ad17fa in __gthread_mutex_lock (__mutex=0x6c5448) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bits/gthr-default.h:749
#3 std::mutex::lock (this=0x6c5448) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/bits/std_mutex.h:100
#4 std::unique_lock<std::mutex>::lock (this=0x7fffffff09a8, this=0x7fffffff09a8) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/bits/unique_lock.h:141
#5 std::unique_lock<std::mutex>::unique_lock (__m=..., this=0x7fffffff09a8) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/bits/unique_lock.h:71
#6 nix::Sync<nix::ProgressBar::State, std::mutex>::Lock::Lock (s=0x6c5448, this=0x7fffffff09a0) at src/libutil/sync.hh:45
#7 nix::Sync<nix::ProgressBar::State, std::mutex>::lock (this=0x6c5448) at src/libutil/sync.hh:85
#8 nix::ProgressBar::logEI (this=0x6c5440, ei=...) at src/libmain/progress-bar.cc:131
#9 0x00007ffff7608cfd in nix::Logger::logEI (ei=..., lvl=nix::lvlError, this=0x6c5440) at src/libutil/logging.hh:88
#10 nix::getCodeLines (errPos=...) at src/libutil/error.cc:66
#11 0x00007ffff76073f2 in nix::showErrorInfo (out=..., einfo=..., showTrace=<optimized out>) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/optional:897
#12 0x00007ffff7ad19e7 in nix::ProgressBar::logEI (this=0x6c5440, ei=...) at src/libmain/progress-bar.cc:134
#13 0x00007ffff7ab9d10 in nix::Logger::logEI (ei=..., lvl=nix::lvlError, this=0x6c5440) at src/libutil/logging.hh:88
#14 nix::handleExceptions(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, std::function<void ()>) (programName="/home/eelco/Dev/nix/outputs/out/bin/nix", fun=...) at src/libmain/shared.cc:328
#15 0x000000000046226b in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/ext/new_allocator.h:80
Ericson2314
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2022
reword section on store objects
Ericson2314
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2025
We now see exception beeing thrown when remote building in master because of writing to a non-blocking file descriptor from our json logger. > #0 0x00007f2ea97aea9c in __pthread_kill_implementation () from /nix/store/wn7v2vhyyyi6clcyn0s9ixvl7d4d87ic-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libc.so.6 > #1 0x00007f2ea975c576 in raise () from /nix/store/wn7v2vhyyyi6clcyn0s9ixvl7d4d87ic-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libc.so.6 > #2 0x00007f2ea9744935 in abort () from /nix/store/wn7v2vhyyyi6clcyn0s9ixvl7d4d87ic-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libc.so.6 > #3 0x00007f2ea99e8c2b in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() [clone .cold] () from /nix/store/ybjcla5bhj8g1y84998pn4a2drfxybkv-gcc-13.3.0-lib/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #4 0x00007f2ea99f820a in __cxxabiv1::__terminate(void (*)()) () from /nix/store/ybjcla5bhj8g1y84998pn4a2drfxybkv-gcc-13.3.0-lib/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #5 0x00007f2ea99f8275 in std::terminate() () from /nix/store/ybjcla5bhj8g1y84998pn4a2drfxybkv-gcc-13.3.0-lib/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #6 0x00007f2ea99f84c7 in __cxa_throw () from /nix/store/ybjcla5bhj8g1y84998pn4a2drfxybkv-gcc-13.3.0-lib/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #7 0x00007f2eaa5035c2 in nix::writeFull (fd=2, s=..., allowInterrupts=true) at ../unix/file-descriptor.cc:43 > #8 0x00007f2eaa5633c4 in nix::JSONLogger::write (this=this@entry=0x249a7d40, json=...) at /nix/store/4krab2h0hd4wvxxmscxrw21pl77j4i7j-gcc-13.3.0/include/c++/13.3.0/bits/char_traits.h:358 > #9 0x00007f2eaa5658d7 in nix::JSONLogger::logEI (this=<optimized out>, ei=...) at ../logging.cc:242 > #10 0x00007f2ea9c5d048 in nix::Logger::logEI (ei=..., lvl=nix::lvlError, this=0x249a7d40) at /nix/store/a7cq5bqh0ryvnkv4m19ffchnvi8l9qx6-nix-util-2.27.0-dev/include/nix/logging.hh:108 > #11 nix::handleExceptions (programName="nix", fun=...) at ../shared.cc:343 > #12 0x0000000000465b1f in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at /nix/store/4krab2h0hd4wvxxmscxrw21pl77j4i7j-gcc-13.3.0/include/c++/13.3.0/bits/allocator.h:163 > (gdb) frame 10 > #10 0x00007f2ea9c5d048 in nix::Logger::logEI (ei=..., lvl=nix::lvlError, this=0x249a7d40) at /nix/store/a7cq5bqh0ryvnkv4m19ffchnvi8l9qx6-nix-util-2.27.0-dev/include/nix/logging.hh:108 > 108 logEI(ei); So far only drainFD sets the non-blocking flag on a "readable" file descriptor, while this is a "writeable" file descriptor. It's not clear to me yet, why we see logs after that point, but it's also not that bad to handle EAGAIN in read/write functions after all.
Ericson2314
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2025
This was removed in NixOS#11152. However, we need it for the multi-threaded evaluator, because otherwise Boehm GC will crash while scanning the thread stack: #0 GC_push_all_eager (bottom=<optimized out>, top=<optimized out>) at extra/../mark.c:1488 #1 0x00007ffff74691d5 in GC_push_all_stack_sections (lo=<optimized out>, hi=<optimized out>, traced_stack_sect=0x0) at extra/../mark_rts.c:704 #2 GC_push_all_stacks () at extra/../pthread_stop_world.c:876 #3 GC_default_push_other_roots () at extra/../os_dep.c:2893 #4 0x00007ffff746235c in GC_mark_some (cold_gc_frame=0x7ffee8ecaa50 "`\304G\367\377\177") at extra/../mark.c:374 #5 0x00007ffff7465a8d in GC_stopped_mark (stop_func=stop_func@entry=0x7ffff7453c80 <GC_never_stop_func>) at extra/../alloc.c:875 #6 0x00007ffff7466724 in GC_try_to_collect_inner (stop_func=0x7ffff7453c80 <GC_never_stop_func>) at extra/../alloc.c:624 #7 0x00007ffff7466a22 in GC_collect_or_expand (needed_blocks=needed_blocks@entry=1, ignore_off_page=ignore_off_page@entry=0, retry=retry@entry=0) at extra/../alloc.c:1688 #8 0x00007ffff746878f in GC_allocobj (gran=<optimized out>, kind=<optimized out>) at extra/../alloc.c:1798 #9 GC_generic_malloc_inner (lb=<optimized out>, k=k@entry=1) at extra/../malloc.c:193 #10 0x00007ffff746cd40 in GC_generic_malloc_many (lb=<optimized out>, k=<optimized out>, result=<optimized out>) at extra/../mallocx.c:477 #11 0x00007ffff746cf35 in GC_malloc_kind (bytes=120, kind=1) at extra/../thread_local_alloc.c:187 #12 0x00007ffff796ede5 in nix::allocBytes (n=<optimized out>, n=<optimized out>) at ../src/libexpr/include/nix/expr/eval-inline.hh:19 This is because it will use the stack pointer of the coroutine, so it will scan a region of memory that doesn't exist, e.g. Stack for thread 0x7ffea4ff96c0 is [0x7ffe80197af0w,0x7ffea4ffa000) (where 0x7ffe80197af0w is the sp of the coroutine and 0x7ffea4ffa000 is the base of the thread stack). We don't scan coroutine stacks, because currently they don't have GC roots (there is no evaluation happening in coroutines). So there is currently no need to restore the other parts of the original patch, such as BoehmGCStackAllocator.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.