api index #1765
Merged
api index #1765
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mbostock
force-pushed
the
mbostock/api-index
branch
from
c8a5cb5 to
0306ed8
Compare
|
Trying this for now. Let me know if you want changes. I think I’d like to use shorter, explicit anchor fragments across the site, for example, such as |
|
Love it! |
Fil
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2023
* api index * fix crosshair link * externalize list style
chaichontat
pushed a commit
to chaichontat/plot
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2024
* api index * fix crosshair link * externalize list style
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #1752.
Enumerates every method with a brief description pulled from the documentation:
Also enumerates every option, showing which interface the option is defined:
It would perhaps be better to provide more specific links (e.g., to the
#bendanchor fragment instead of the general arrow mark documentation), but I think that’s non-blocking and we could add that in the future as desired.