Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

combine prettier into main workflow #1227

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2023
Merged

combine prettier into main workflow #1227

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2023

Conversation

mbostock
Copy link
Member

@mbostock mbostock commented Jan 16, 2023

@mbostock mbostock force-pushed the mbostock/unify-workflow branch from e8770f0 to a5f597c Compare January 16, 2023 19:24
@mbostock mbostock requested a review from Fil January 16, 2023 19:27
@mbostock mbostock marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2023 19:27
@@ -25,7 +25,8 @@ jobs:
- run: yarn --frozen-lockfile
- run: |
echo ::add-matcher::.github/eslint.json
yarn run eslint . --format=compact
yarn run eslint src test --format=compact
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the eslint . works in CI because we haven’t generated any files yet (whereas it will fail locally with errors on generated files in build and types). So, this is just being more explicit about what we’re testing so that it’s not confusing when you try to run this command locally.

@mbostock mbostock merged commit eec122d into main Jan 16, 2023
@mbostock mbostock deleted the mbostock/unify-workflow branch January 16, 2023 21:33
chaichontat pushed a commit to chaichontat/plot that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants