Skip to content

Conversation

@rbonichon
Copy link
Contributor

Previously, we were considering two types of runtime table configurations, indexed and custom.
Indexed where supposed to represent "standard" array access, using indexed from 0 to N, which can be easily represented as a "custom" runtime table configurations whose first columns is from 0 to N.

It also simplifies the wasm binding as enum with structure values can not be represented using wasm-bindgen.

@dannywillems dannywillems mentioned this pull request Jul 20, 2023
Previously, we were considering two types of runtime table configurations,
indexed and custom.
Indexed where supposed to represent "standard" array access, using indexed from
0 to N, which can be easily represented as a "custom" runtime table
configurations whose first columns is from 0 to N.

It also simplifies the wasm binding as enum with structure values can not be
represented using wasm-bindgen.
@mrmr1993 mrmr1993 merged commit fc25f6c into develop Jul 20, 2023
@mrmr1993 mrmr1993 deleted the rb/wannabedevelop branch July 20, 2023 14:53
@mrmr1993 mrmr1993 restored the rb/wannabedevelop branch July 20, 2023 14:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants