Skip to content

Conversation

@dannywillems
Copy link
Member

Initially, it was used to reflect the OCaml code in src/lib/pickles/plonk_checks. However, I do think we have to change that as it makes the code more readable from a cryptography point of view.

Initially, it was used to reflect the OCaml code in
`src/lib/pickles/plonk_checks`. However, I do think we have to change that as it
makes the code more readable from a cryptography point of view.
@dannywillems dannywillems force-pushed the dw/remove-usage-of-fst-and-use-point-name branch from cfe85fe to d539303 Compare November 12, 2024 11:19
Copy link
Collaborator

@tizoc tizoc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe @sebastiencs wants to take a look, but to me the change looks trivial. LGTM

@dannywillems
Copy link
Member Author

FWIW: @sebastiencs was next to me at DevCon when doing this PR. We were commenting on some aesthetic improvements of Pickles and OpenMina

@tizoc
Copy link
Collaborator

tizoc commented Nov 13, 2024

@dannywillems please go ahead and merge (with the approval you should already be able to do so)

@sebastiencs sebastiencs merged commit d72607f into develop Nov 20, 2024
28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants