[wip] #37 feat: tt permissions suggest <workflow> — batch pre-approve all workflow commands

[nutt-adam]

Kickoff PR to guarantee active workstream for #37 within the 8-hour delivery window.\n\nThis PR opens the branch and checklist; subsequent commits will implement the issue proper.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added internal planning documentation for upcoming work.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 541bbe62-d92d-4ab5-a50e-c679d0f4bab4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8c4f1eb and 07c7b66.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• plans/issue-kickoff/issue-37.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new Markdown document was added to the planning directory for Issue #37 kickoff, containing sections for goal, first slice tasks, and blockers. This is purely documentation scaffolding with no code modifications or logic changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation & Planning plans/issue-kickoff/issue-37.md	New kickoff planning document for Issue #37 with goal, first slice checklist, and blockers sections.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A new document springs to life,
Plans and checklists to end the strife,
Issue #37, now charted clear,
Goals and blockers all appear!
Progress hops along the way! 🌟

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	⚠️ Warning	The title is overly specific about implementation details ([wip], workflow commands, batch pre-approve) but the actual change is only a kickoff document; the title describes planned work, not the actual changeset content.	Simplify the title to reflect the actual change, such as 'Add issue #37 kickoff plan and checklist' or '[wip] Issue #37 kickoff and planning document'.
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description explains the PR's purpose but lacks required sections from the template: versioning checklist, SemVer choice, validation steps, and release information are all missing.	Complete the required template sections: add the versioning checklist (even if justifying no changes), specify a SemVer choice, confirm validation steps, and include release information.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch wren/issue-37-kickoff

📝 Coding Plan

• Generate coding plan for human review comments

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[nutt-adam]

Automation: converted from draft to ready for review to unblock merge checks.

[nutt-adam]

Automation: marked ready for review to unblock CI/review gates.

[nutt-adam]

Automation: synced branch with main to clear 'behind' merge gate.