Merged
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'Brillig Bytecode Size'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.01.
| Benchmark suite | Current: ce30660 | Previous: 35b5102 | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
evaluate_quadratic_expression_12_elements_BLS12_377Fq_Bench |
5545 opcodes |
5450 opcodes |
1.02 |
evaluate_quadratic_expression_12_elements_BLS12_377Fr_Bench |
5376 opcodes |
5293 opcodes |
1.02 |
evaluate_quadratic_expression_12_elements_BLS12_381Fq_Bench |
5545 opcodes |
5450 opcodes |
1.02 |
evaluate_quadratic_expression_12_elements_BLS12_381Fr_Bench |
5376 opcodes |
5293 opcodes |
1.02 |
evaluate_quadratic_expression_12_elements_BN254_Fq_Bench |
5376 opcodes |
5293 opcodes |
1.02 |
evaluate_quadratic_expression_12_elements_U2048_Bench |
6820 opcodes |
6719 opcodes |
1.02 |
evaluate_quadratic_expression_12_elements_U256_Bench |
5372 opcodes |
5289 opcodes |
1.02 |
evaluate_quadratic_expression_3_elements_BLS12_377Fq_Bench |
3784 opcodes |
3678 opcodes |
1.03 |
evaluate_quadratic_expression_3_elements_BLS12_377Fr_Bench |
3668 opcodes |
3574 opcodes |
1.03 |
evaluate_quadratic_expression_3_elements_BLS12_381Fq_Bench |
3784 opcodes |
3678 opcodes |
1.03 |
evaluate_quadratic_expression_3_elements_BLS12_381Fr_Bench |
3668 opcodes |
3574 opcodes |
1.03 |
evaluate_quadratic_expression_3_elements_BN254_Fq_Bench |
3668 opcodes |
3574 opcodes |
1.03 |
evaluate_quadratic_expression_3_elements_U2048_Bench |
4302 opcodes |
4190 opcodes |
1.03 |
evaluate_quadratic_expression_3_elements_U256_Bench |
3664 opcodes |
3570 opcodes |
1.03 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
jialinli98
approved these changes
Aug 25, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Problem*
Resolves #199.
Summary*
Bump to test repo and describe repo's compatibility with Noir v1.0.0-beta.11.
This PR also moves away from https://bbup.aztec.network to https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AztecProtocol/aztec-packages/refs/heads/next/barretenberg/bbup/install for installing bb in CI.
Additional context
Tests blocked by:
PR Checklist*
cargo fmton default settings.