Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 9, 2024. It is now read-only.

feat(acir)!: Verify Proof#291

Merged
kevaundray merged 27 commits intomasterfrom
mv/verify-proof-2
Jun 6, 2023
Merged

feat(acir)!: Verify Proof#291
kevaundray merged 27 commits intomasterfrom
mv/verify-proof-2

Conversation

@vezenovm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@vezenovm vezenovm commented May 17, 2023

Related issue(s)

Resolves #198

The acvm-backend-barretenberg PR which implements this can be found here:
noir-lang/acvm-backend-barretenberg#207
The relevant Noir PR which implements this and the backend PR can be found here:
noir-lang/noir#1491

Description

Add VerifyProof variant to BlackBoxFunc enum

Summary of changes

(Describe the changes in this PR. Point out breaking changes if any.)

Dependency additions / changes

(If applicable.)

Test additions / changes

(If applicable.)

Checklist

  • I have tested the changes locally.
  • I have formatted the changes with Prettier and/or cargo fmt with default settings.
  • I have linked this PR to the issue(s) that it resolves.
  • I have reviewed the changes on GitHub, line by line.
  • I have ensured all changes are covered in the description.

Additional context

(If applicable.)

@vezenovm vezenovm changed the base branch from master to kw/back-to-serde May 17, 2023 18:16
Base automatically changed from kw/back-to-serde to master May 19, 2023 08:30
@vezenovm vezenovm marked this pull request as ready for review May 22, 2023 13:51
Comment thread acir/src/circuit/opcodes/black_box_function_call.rs Outdated
Comment thread acvm/src/lib.rs
Comment thread acvm/src/lib.rs
Comment thread acir/src/circuit/opcodes/black_box_function_call.rs Outdated
Comment thread acir/src/circuit/opcodes/black_box_function_call.rs
Comment thread acir/src/circuit/opcodes/black_box_function_call.rs
Comment thread acir/src/circuit/opcodes/black_box_function_call.rs Outdated
Comment thread acir/src/circuit/opcodes/black_box_function_call.rs Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kevaundray kevaundray left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally looks okay -- Some overall questions:

  • Can you give a brief outline as to how this opcode will be used from the user perspective? (I'm trying to understand the rationale behind this interface)

  • The size of the aggregation objects can change depending on the proving system, where do we account for this?

Comment thread acir/src/circuit/black_box_functions.rs Outdated
@vezenovm vezenovm requested a review from kevaundray May 23, 2023 18:28
Comment thread acvm/src/lib.rs Outdated
@vezenovm vezenovm requested a review from kevaundray May 26, 2023 14:41
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kevaundray kevaundray left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks okay

@kevaundray kevaundray added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 6, 2023
Merged via the queue into master with commit 9f34428 Jun 6, 2023
@kevaundray kevaundray mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add recursion opcode

3 participants