Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 9, 2024. It is now read-only.

chore(acvm)!: update hash function dependencies#260

Merged
TomAFrench merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
kw/update-hashes
May 5, 2023
Merged

chore(acvm)!: update hash function dependencies#260
TomAFrench merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
kw/update-hashes

Conversation

@kevaundray
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Related issue(s)

Related to changes in #247 -- Updating the depedencies to use 0.10

(If it does not already exist, first create a GitHub issue that describes the problem this Pull Request (PR) solves before creating the PR and link it here.)

Resolves (link to issue)

Description

Summary of changes

(Describe the changes in this PR. Point out breaking changes if any.)

Dependency additions / changes

(If applicable.)

Test additions / changes

(If applicable.)

Checklist

  • I have tested the changes locally.
  • I have formatted the changes with Prettier and/or cargo fmt with default settings.
  • I have linked this PR to the issue(s) that it resolves.
  • I have reviewed the changes on GitHub, line by line.
  • I have ensured all changes are covered in the description.

Additional context

(If applicable.)

@kevaundray kevaundray changed the title chore!(acvm): update hash function dependencies chore(acvm)!: update hash function dependencies May 4, 2023
@TomAFrench TomAFrench added this pull request to the merge queue May 5, 2023
Merged via the queue into master with commit d4649c6 May 5, 2023
@TomAFrench TomAFrench deleted the kw/update-hashes branch May 5, 2023 10:07
@TomAFrench
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TomAFrench commented May 5, 2023

On second thoughts, this isn't breaking right? @kevaundray

TomAFrench added a commit that referenced this pull request May 8, 2023
* master:
  changes the name of blake to be blakes2s256 (#261)
  update hash functions (#260)
  feat!: Remove `solve` from PWG trait & introduce separate solvers for each blackbox (#257)
  chore: Release 0.11.0 (#250)
  feat(acvm): Add generic error for failing to solve an opcode (#251)
TomAFrench added a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2023
* master: (49 commits)
  feat(acvm)!: Add CommonReferenceString backend trait (#231)
  fix(acir): Hide variants of WitnessMapError and export it from package (#283)
  feat!: Introduce WitnessMap data structure to avoid leaking internal structure (#252)
  feat!: use struct variants for blackbox function calls (#269)
  chore(acvm)!: Backend trait must implement Debug (#275)
  chore!: remove `OpcodeResolutionError::UnexpectedOpcode` (#274)
  chore(acvm)!: rename `hash_to_field128_security` to `hash_to_field_128_security` (#271)
  feat(acvm)!: update black box solver interfaces to match `pwg:black_box::solve` (#268)
  chore(acir_field): remove unnecessary `to_vec()` (#267)
  chore(acvm)!: expose separate solvers for AND and XOR opcodes (#266)
  feat(acvm)!: Simplification pass for ACIR (#151)
  changes the name of blake to be blakes2s256 (#261)
  update hash functions (#260)
  feat!: Remove `solve` from PWG trait & introduce separate solvers for each blackbox (#257)
  chore: Release 0.11.0 (#250)
  feat(acvm): Add generic error for failing to solve an opcode (#251)
  fix(acir): Fix `Expression` multiplication to correctly handle degree 1 terms (#255)
  chore(acir): organise opcodes definitions (#254)
  chore: remove usage of `insert_witness` with `insert_value` (#253)
  feat: Add Keccak Hash function (#259)
  ...
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants