Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: remove minor contradiction in debugger doc #9832

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Nov 29, 2016

Checklist
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

doc debugger

Description of change

The doc says the debugger is and also isn't full-featured. Even if the sentences are talking about different things, it's confusing. full-featured seems superfluous in the first sentence anyway, so
remove it.

@Trott Trott added debugger doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. labels Nov 29, 2016
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added debugger doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. labels Nov 29, 2016
via a simple [TCP-based protocol][] and built-in debugging client. To use it,
start Node.js with the `debug` argument followed by the path to the script to
debug; a prompt will be displayed indicating successful launch of the debugger:
Node.js includes an out-of-process debugging utility accessible via a simple
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not remove "a simple" as well? The simplicity of the protocol is debated, and irrelevant to the user of the protocol anyway.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Superfluous simple removed.

The doc says the debugger is and also isn't full-featured. Even if the
sentences are talking about different things, it's confusing.
`full-featured` seems superfluous in the first sentence anyway, so
remove it.
Copy link
Member

@mhdawson mhdawson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with change suggested by Sam.

Trott added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2016
The doc says the debugger is and also isn't full-featured. Even if the
sentences are talking about different things, it's confusing.
`full-featured` seems superfluous in the first sentence anyway, so
remove it. Remove a superfluous `simple` while we're at it.

PR-URL: #9832
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Dec 2, 2016

Landed in 98f9b5d

@Trott Trott closed this Dec 2, 2016
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2016
The doc says the debugger is and also isn't full-featured. Even if the
sentences are talking about different things, it's confusing.
`full-featured` seems superfluous in the first sentence anyway, so
remove it. Remove a superfluous `simple` while we're at it.

PR-URL: #9832
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2016
2 tasks
jmdarling pushed a commit to jmdarling/node that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2016
The doc says the debugger is and also isn't full-featured. Even if the
sentences are talking about different things, it's confusing.
`full-featured` seems superfluous in the first sentence anyway, so
remove it. Remove a superfluous `simple` while we're at it.

PR-URL: nodejs#9832
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2016
The doc says the debugger is and also isn't full-featured. Even if the
sentences are talking about different things, it's confusing.
`full-featured` seems superfluous in the first sentence anyway, so
remove it. Remove a superfluous `simple` while we're at it.

PR-URL: #9832
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2016
The doc says the debugger is and also isn't full-featured. Even if the
sentences are talking about different things, it's confusing.
`full-featured` seems superfluous in the first sentence anyway, so
remove it. Remove a superfluous `simple` while we're at it.

PR-URL: #9832
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2016
The doc says the debugger is and also isn't full-featured. Even if the
sentences are talking about different things, it's confusing.
`full-featured` seems superfluous in the first sentence anyway, so
remove it. Remove a superfluous `simple` while we're at it.

PR-URL: #9832
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2016
The doc says the debugger is and also isn't full-featured. Even if the
sentences are talking about different things, it's confusing.
`full-featured` seems superfluous in the first sentence anyway, so
remove it. Remove a superfluous `simple` while we're at it.

PR-URL: #9832
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
This was referenced Dec 21, 2016
@Trott Trott deleted the debugger-doc branch January 13, 2022 22:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants