Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

src: clean up program/isolate/env init logic #9224

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 24, 2016

Conversation

bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

General cleanup:

  1. Shuffle around the startup sequence so it's less a ball of twine, and
  2. Remove the unnecessary NodeInstance class.

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. label Oct 21, 2016
Copy link
Member

@jasnell jasnell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with green CI

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member Author

I started the CI yesterday but it doesn't show up. New run: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/4618/

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Oct 22, 2016

Some red there but they appear to be unrelated.

NodeInstanceData is not used meaningfully and makes the initialization
logic harder to follow.  Let's remove it and delete 100 lines of code
in one fell swoop.

PR-URL: nodejs#9224
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reorder the initialization logic so that program-wide, per-isolate and
per-environment initialization is more cleanly separated.

PR-URL: nodejs#9224
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis closed this Oct 24, 2016
@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis deleted the simplify-startup branch October 24, 2016 20:42
@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis merged commit ceb6023 into nodejs:master Oct 24, 2016
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2016
NodeInstanceData is not used meaningfully and makes the initialization
logic harder to follow.  Let's remove it and delete 100 lines of code
in one fell swoop.

PR-URL: #9224
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2016
Reorder the initialization logic so that program-wide, per-isolate and
per-environment initialization is more cleanly separated.

PR-URL: #9224
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

@bnoordhuis should this be backported? I'm assuming it shouldn't land on v4. It does not land cleanly on v6. Please feel free to update labels

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member Author

Back-porting isn't necessary unless it causes conflicts for other pull requests. Let me know if that is the case.

@MylesBorins MylesBorins added the baking-for-lts PRs that need to wait before landing in a LTS release. label May 8, 2017
@MylesBorins MylesBorins removed the baking-for-lts PRs that need to wait before landing in a LTS release. label Aug 17, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants