Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

src: remove out-of-date TODO comment #9000

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

danbev
Copy link
Contributor

@danbev danbev commented Oct 10, 2016

Checklist
  • make -j8 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test nosign (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

src

Description of change

This commit attempts to fix one of the items in
#4641, which was to remove a
TODO the UDPWrap::OnSend function and share the code in that method with
StreamWrap::AfterWrite.

While looking into this addaleax pointed out that the implementations
for these two functions have diverged since the original comment
was added:

$ git log --pretty=short -u -L 357,357:src/udp_wrap.cc

$ git show cbd4033:src/udp_wrap.cc |
grep -1 -A26 'UDPWrap::OnSend'

git show cbd4033:src/stream_wrap.cc |
grep -A27 'void StreamWrap::AfterWrite'

Removing the TODO comment seems appropriate in this case.

This commit attempts to fix one of the items in
nodejs#4641, which was to remove a
TODO the UDPWrap::OnSend function and share the code in that method with
StreamWrap::AfterWrite.

While looking into this addaleax pointed out that the implementations
for these two functions have diverged since the original comment
was added:

$ git log --pretty=short -u -L 357,357:src/udp_wrap.cc

$ git show cbd4033:src/udp_wrap.cc |
grep -1 -A26 'UDPWrap::OnSend'

git show cbd4033:src/stream_wrap.cc |
grep -A27 'void StreamWrap::AfterWrite'

Removing the TODO comment seems appropriate in this case.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. label Oct 10, 2016
@mscdex mscdex added the dgram Issues and PRs related to the dgram subsystem / UDP. label Oct 10, 2016
@mscdex
Copy link
Contributor

mscdex commented Oct 10, 2016

/cc @bnoordhuis ?

Copy link
Member

@jasnell jasnell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Oct 10, 2016

Trivial enough not to have to wait the full 48 hours. Will get this landed.

@jasnell jasnell self-assigned this Oct 10, 2016
jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2016
This commit attempts to fix one of the items in
#4641, which was to remove a
TODO the UDPWrap::OnSend function and share the code in that method with
StreamWrap::AfterWrite.

While looking into this addaleax pointed out that the implementations
for these two functions have diverged since the original comment
was added:

$ git log --pretty=short -u -L 357,357:src/udp_wrap.cc

$ git show cbd4033:src/udp_wrap.cc |
grep -1 -A26 'UDPWrap::OnSend'

git show cbd4033:src/stream_wrap.cc |
grep -A27 'void StreamWrap::AfterWrite'

Removing the TODO comment seems appropriate in this case.

PR-URL: #9000
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Oct 10, 2016

Landed in 1bfa026

@jasnell jasnell closed this Oct 10, 2016
jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2016
This commit attempts to fix one of the items in
#4641, which was to remove a
TODO the UDPWrap::OnSend function and share the code in that method with
StreamWrap::AfterWrite.

While looking into this addaleax pointed out that the implementations
for these two functions have diverged since the original comment
was added:

$ git log --pretty=short -u -L 357,357:src/udp_wrap.cc

$ git show cbd4033:src/udp_wrap.cc |
grep -1 -A26 'UDPWrap::OnSend'

git show cbd4033:src/stream_wrap.cc |
grep -A27 'void StreamWrap::AfterWrite'

Removing the TODO comment seems appropriate in this case.

PR-URL: #9000
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
@danbev danbev deleted the remove-OnSend-comment branch October 11, 2016 08:35
Fishrock123 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2016
This commit attempts to fix one of the items in
#4641, which was to remove a
TODO the UDPWrap::OnSend function and share the code in that method with
StreamWrap::AfterWrite.

While looking into this addaleax pointed out that the implementations
for these two functions have diverged since the original comment
was added:

$ git log --pretty=short -u -L 357,357:src/udp_wrap.cc

$ git show cbd4033:src/udp_wrap.cc |
grep -1 -A26 'UDPWrap::OnSend'

git show cbd4033:src/stream_wrap.cc |
grep -A27 'void StreamWrap::AfterWrite'

Removing the TODO comment seems appropriate in this case.

PR-URL: #9000
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2016
This commit attempts to fix one of the items in
#4641, which was to remove a
TODO the UDPWrap::OnSend function and share the code in that method with
StreamWrap::AfterWrite.

While looking into this addaleax pointed out that the implementations
for these two functions have diverged since the original comment
was added:

$ git log --pretty=short -u -L 357,357:src/udp_wrap.cc

$ git show cbd4033:src/udp_wrap.cc |
grep -1 -A26 'UDPWrap::OnSend'

git show cbd4033:src/stream_wrap.cc |
grep -A27 'void StreamWrap::AfterWrite'

Removing the TODO comment seems appropriate in this case.

PR-URL: #9000
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Nov 22, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. dgram Issues and PRs related to the dgram subsystem / UDP.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants