Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: use strict equality in regression test #8098

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Aug 14, 2016

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test nosign (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test

Description of change

Replace == with === and assert.strictEqual() in
test-regress-GH-877.js.

Replace `==` with `===` and `assert.strictEqual()` in
test-regress-nodejsGH-877.js.
@Trott Trott added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Aug 14, 2016
@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Aug 14, 2016

LGTM

4 similar comments
@fhinkel
Copy link
Member

fhinkel commented Aug 14, 2016

LGTM

@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

cjihrig commented Aug 15, 2016

LGTM

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Aug 15, 2016

LGTM

@santigimeno
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Aug 16, 2016

CI is yellow on AIX flaky test, green everywhere else: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/3665/

Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2016
Replace `==` with `===` and `assert.strictEqual()` in
test-regress-nodejsGH-877.js.

PR-URL: nodejs#8098
Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: cjihrig - Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: jasnell - James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Aug 17, 2016

Landed in 8badb67

@Trott Trott closed this Aug 17, 2016
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2016
Replace `==` with `===` and `assert.strictEqual()` in
test-regress-GH-877.js.

PR-URL: #8098
Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: cjihrig - Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: jasnell - James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2016
Replace `==` with `===` and `assert.strictEqual()` in
test-regress-GH-877.js.

PR-URL: #8098
Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: cjihrig - Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: jasnell - James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2016
Replace `==` with `===` and `assert.strictEqual()` in
test-regress-GH-877.js.

PR-URL: #8098
Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: cjihrig - Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: jasnell - James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2016
Replace `==` with `===` and `assert.strictEqual()` in
test-regress-GH-877.js.

PR-URL: #8098
Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: cjihrig - Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: jasnell - James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2016
@Trott Trott deleted the stricteqeqeq branch January 13, 2022 22:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants