Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

meta: clarify nomination process according to Node.js charter #50834

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 26, 2023
Merged

meta: clarify nomination process according to Node.js charter #50834

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
a023014
meta: clarify nomination process according to Node.js charter
mcollina Nov 21, 2023
97acd78
Update GOVERNANCE.md
mcollina Nov 21, 2023
565d236
Update GOVERNANCE.md
mcollina Nov 21, 2023
ea35554
Update GOVERNANCE.md
mcollina Nov 22, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions GOVERNANCE.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -153,6 +153,9 @@ the nomination.

The nomination passes if no collaborators oppose it after one week. Otherwise,
the nomination fails.
Maintaining the list of collaborators is a key reponsibility
of the [Node.js TSC](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/blob/main/TSC-Charter.md#section-4-responsibilities-of-the-tsc),
and as a result the TSC can decide to override the opposition.
mcollina marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

There are steps a nominator can take in advance to make a nomination as
frictionless as possible. To request feedback from other collaborators in
Expand Down
Loading