-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
http: improves expect header handling #4501
http: improves expect header handling #4501
Conversation
res._expect_continue = true; | ||
if (EventEmitter.listenerCount(self, 'checkContinue') > 0) { | ||
self.emit('checkContinue', req, res); | ||
if (!util.isUndefined(req.headers.expect) && |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Avoid the type-checking util.*
functions in node core code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks and done
ce42fcd
to
25f7e6a
Compare
res._expect_continue = true; | ||
if (EventEmitter.listenerCount(self, 'checkContinue') > 0) { | ||
self.emit('checkContinue', req, res); | ||
if (typeof req.headers.expect !== 'undefined' && |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a nit, but checking directly against undefined
(req.headers.expect !== undefined
) instead of using typeof
is preferred, when compared to the rest of the code base.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I appreciate the nit picks :-) should be fixed now
25f7e6a
to
2343cb2
Compare
if (continueExpression.test(req.headers.expect)) { | ||
res._expect_continue = true; | ||
|
||
if (EventEmitter.listenerCount(self, 'checkContinue') > 0) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also while we're in here, EventEmitter.listenerCount()
is deprecated, so we should just use self.listenerCount('checkContinue');
instead and similarly for the other event below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mscdex There is one other use of the EventEmitter.listenerCount
in the file. Should I update it as well, or just change it in this new code?
Not sure how tightly scoped y'all like to keep the PRs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, I think that should be ok.
2343cb2
to
20db3fe
Compare
})); | ||
|
||
http.request(options).on('response', (res) => { | ||
process.exit(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we generally try to avoid explicitly calling process.exit()
in tests. Could you instead just close the server (which should make the process exit on it's own)?
Marking |
Generally LGTM but @evanlucas is correct about not calling |
I'll try and get that knocked out this evening or tomorrow morning. Thanks for the feedback |
99b615d
to
e7d2033
Compare
This should be ready to rock and roll now. Tests have been rewritten to use |
@designfrontier the linter is complaining.... looks like |
Now returns a 417 error status or allows for an event listener on the `checkExpectation` event. Before we were ignoring requests that had misspelled `100-continue` values for expect headers. This is a quick port of the work done here: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#7132 by alFReD-NSH with surrounding discussion here: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#4651 Also updates all the instances of the deprecated EventEmitter.listenerCount to the current self.listenerCount. Most of these were in the new code ported over but there was another legacy instance. Refs: nodejs#2403
e7d2033
to
810158c
Compare
whoops eslint was acting up for me in sublime apparently. Fixed. |
I think the other CI test failure is unrelated, but here goes again: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/1166/ |
Looks like it passed jenkins... anything else I need to do on this? |
LGTM @nodejs/http |
Seems OK |
Now returns a 417 error status or allows for an event listener on the `checkExpectation` event. Before we were ignoring requests that had misspelled `100-continue` values for expect headers. This is a quick port of the work done here: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#7132 by alFReD-NSH with surrounding discussion here: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#4651 Also updates all the instances of the deprecated EventEmitter.listenerCount to the current self.listenerCount. Most of these were in the new code ported over but there was another legacy instance. Refs: #2403 PR-URL: #4501 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Landed in d755432 |
Nice work @designfrontier! I believe this is your first commit in to core, if so, welcome on board! I hope you stick around and find other ways to contribute. |
It is! I plan to stick around and keep grabbing ticket when I have spare
|
Now returns a 417 error status or allows for an event listener on the `checkExpectation` event. Before we were ignoring requests that had misspelled `100-continue` values for expect headers. This is a quick port of the work done here: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#7132 by alFReD-NSH with surrounding discussion here: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#4651 Also updates all the instances of the deprecated EventEmitter.listenerCount to the current self.listenerCount. Most of these were in the new code ported over but there was another legacy instance. Refs: #2403 PR-URL: #4501 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Notable changes: * events: make sure console functions exist (Dave) #4479 * fs: add autoClose option to fs.createWriteStream (Saquib) #3679 * http: improves expect header handling (Daniel Sellers) #4501 * node: allow preload modules with -i (Evan Lucas) #4696 * v8,src: expose statistics about heap spaces (`v8.getHeapSpaceStatistics()`) (Ben Ripkens) #4463 * Minor performance improvements: - lib: Use arrow functions instead of bind where possible (Minwoo Jung) #3622 - module: cache stat() results more aggressively (Ben Noordhuis) #4575 - querystring: improve parse() performance (Brian White) #4675 PR-URL: #4742
Notable changes: * events: make sure console functions exist (Dave) #4479 * fs: add autoClose option to fs.createWriteStream (Saquib) #3679 * http: improves expect header handling (Daniel Sellers) #4501 * node: allow preload modules with -i (Evan Lucas) #4696 * v8,src: expose statistics about heap spaces (`v8.getHeapSpaceStatistics()`) (Ben Ripkens) #4463 * Minor performance improvements: - lib: Use arrow functions instead of bind where possible (Minwoo Jung) #3622 - module: cache stat() results more aggressively (Ben Noordhuis) #4575 - querystring: improve parse() performance (Brian White) #4675 PR-URL: #4742
In Node v5.5.0, the HTTP server became more diligent about sending a HTTP 417 Expectation Failed response if the `Expect` header was not `100-continue`. Since `RequestHelper.httpOptions` was creating requests with an empty `Expect` header, and did not define a `checkExpectation` event handler, the server returned 417 errors for these requests. Also updated `RequestHelper.sendRequest` to use the status code text as the error message if the error response body is empty. https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v5.5.0/ nodejs/node#4501 https://nodejs.org/api/http.html#http_event_checkexpectation https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.4.18 https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.20 https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec8.html#sec8.2.3
In Node v5.5.0, the HTTP server became more diligent about sending a HTTP 417 Expectation Failed response if the `Expect` header was not `100-continue`. Since `RequestHelper.httpOptions` was creating requests with an empty `Expect` header, and did not define a `checkExpectation` event handler, the server returned 417 errors for these requests. Also updated `RequestHelper.sendRequest` to use the status code text as the error message if the error response body is empty. https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v5.5.0/ nodejs/node#4501 https://nodejs.org/api/http.html#http_event_checkexpectation https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.4.18 https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.20 https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec8.html#sec8.2.3
Now returns a 417 error status or allows for an event listener on the `checkExpectation` event. Before we were ignoring requests that had misspelled `100-continue` values for expect headers. This is a quick port of the work done here: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#7132 by alFReD-NSH with surrounding discussion here: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#4651 Also updates all the instances of the deprecated EventEmitter.listenerCount to the current self.listenerCount. Most of these were in the new code ported over but there was another legacy instance. Refs: nodejs#2403 PR-URL: nodejs#4501 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Notable changes: * events: make sure console functions exist (Dave) nodejs#4479 * fs: add autoClose option to fs.createWriteStream (Saquib) nodejs#3679 * http: improves expect header handling (Daniel Sellers) nodejs#4501 * node: allow preload modules with -i (Evan Lucas) nodejs#4696 * v8,src: expose statistics about heap spaces (`v8.getHeapSpaceStatistics()`) (Ben Ripkens) nodejs#4463 * Minor performance improvements: - lib: Use arrow functions instead of bind where possible (Minwoo Jung) nodejs#3622 - module: cache stat() results more aggressively (Ben Noordhuis) nodejs#4575 - querystring: improve parse() performance (Brian White) nodejs#4675 PR-URL: nodejs#4742
…t "Expect" header usage Many MPU tests were setting "Expect: application/json", a presumed accidental misspelling of the "Accept" header. The only valid value for the "Expect" header is "100-continue". Old muskie was using node 0.10. Sometime after 0.10 nodejs/node#4501 changed node behaviour to respond with 417 Expectation Failed if given a bogus "Expect" header.
Now returns a 417 error status or allows for an event listener on
the
checkExpectation
event. Before we were ignoring requests thathad misspelled
100-continue
values for expect headers.This is a quick port of the work done here:
nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#7132 by alFReD-NSH
with surrounding discussion here:
nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#4651
Refs: #2403