-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
http: check if socket
is null before destroy
#43796
Conversation
Review requested:
|
fd4afb7
to
d76a3eb
Compare
socket
if is null before destory
socket
if is null before destorysocket
is null before destory
d76a3eb
to
b17a007
Compare
s/destory/destroy/ in commit message |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
b17a007
to
6f22fde
Compare
Fixed. Thank you. |
socket
is null before destorysocket
is null before destroy
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
@@ -487,15 +487,15 @@ Server.prototype.closeAllConnections = function() { | |||
const connections = this[kConnections].all(); | |||
|
|||
for (let i = 0, l = connections.length; i < l; i++) { | |||
connections[i].socket.destroy(); | |||
connections[i].socket?.destroy(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you explain how/when the socket is nulled?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's related to the flaky GC test I'm investigating (sorry, don't have a laptop to link stuff at the moment).
I noticed that the test instrumenting was setting a object to null at the end but I could never finish the investigation (on my list for Friday).
I think this is superseded by #43949. I'm adding the blocked label to prevent this from landing. |
Fix #43795