Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

http: change totalSocketCount only on socket creation or when the socket is closed #40572

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 10, 2021

Conversation

jodevsa
Copy link
Contributor

@jodevsa jodevsa commented Oct 22, 2021

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added http Issues or PRs related to the http subsystem. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Oct 22, 2021
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please add a test?

@jodevsa jodevsa force-pushed the remove_socket_count_increment branch from a74c6c9 to d50c671 Compare October 23, 2021 00:20
@jodevsa
Copy link
Contributor Author

jodevsa commented Oct 23, 2021

@Trott
I added tests, but turns out it's not a bug :D I'll add more details in the issue, and see how to move forward. I think we have another bug, like the socketCount going down to -1 🙈

@jodevsa jodevsa changed the title http: do not increment socketCount on existing socket reuse http: add tests for http agent totalSocketCount Oct 23, 2021
@jodevsa jodevsa force-pushed the remove_socket_count_increment branch from d50c671 to c907459 Compare October 23, 2021 08:07
@jodevsa jodevsa changed the title http: add tests for http agent totalSocketCount http: change totalSocketCount only on socket creation or when the socket is closed Oct 23, 2021
@jodevsa jodevsa force-pushed the remove_socket_count_increment branch 2 times, most recently from 56415f8 to 2116b6a Compare October 23, 2021 08:18
Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@jodevsa
Copy link
Contributor Author

jodevsa commented Oct 23, 2021

@mcollina is there a way to rerun the failed test?

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@jodevsa jodevsa force-pushed the remove_socket_count_increment branch 2 times, most recently from aa0cced to 63d8bf7 Compare October 23, 2021 20:00
@jodevsa jodevsa requested a review from lpinca October 23, 2021 20:00
@jodevsa jodevsa force-pushed the remove_socket_count_increment branch from 72c7b65 to 09ab76b Compare October 23, 2021 20:18
@jodevsa jodevsa force-pushed the remove_socket_count_increment branch 2 times, most recently from 9b9bf8c to e3f9bdc Compare October 24, 2021 11:34
@jodevsa jodevsa requested a review from lpinca October 24, 2021 11:36
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Nov 8, 2021

Current failures are #40738

Now that that has closed, I imagine a rebase against master and a force push to the PR branch would fix things.

@jodevsa
Copy link
Contributor Author

jodevsa commented Nov 8, 2021

@Trott I will try it out. Thanks for the update :)

@jodevsa
Copy link
Contributor Author

jodevsa commented Nov 9, 2021

@Trott 1 failed :(

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@mcollina
Copy link
Member

mcollina commented Nov 9, 2021

@nodejs/build do you know why asan fails? Can we land anyway?

I'm trying to land this using "node-core-utils" and it is stuck at

Querying API for job/node-test-pull-request/40795/

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Nov 9, 2021

@nodejs/build do you know why asan fails?

I don't know why ASAN fails frequently, but there's a Re-run Workflow button that I always click. I've re-run it here.

Can we land anyway?

Please don't. If it's a real failure, we want to know.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@Trott Trott added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Nov 10, 2021
PR-URL: nodejs#40572
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Voltrex <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ricky Zhou <[email protected]>
@Trott Trott force-pushed the remove_socket_count_increment branch from ef2c276 to d8f1823 Compare November 10, 2021 02:16
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Nov 10, 2021

Landed in d8f1823

@Trott Trott merged commit d8f1823 into nodejs:master Nov 10, 2021
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Nov 10, 2021

Thanks for the contribution! 🎉

And thanks for your patience and persistence!

targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2021
PR-URL: #40572
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Voltrex <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ricky Zhou <[email protected]>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2022
PR-URL: #40572
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Voltrex <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ricky Zhou <[email protected]>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2022
PR-URL: #40572
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Voltrex <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ricky Zhou <[email protected]>
@danielleadams danielleadams mentioned this pull request Feb 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. http Issues or PRs related to the http subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Can someone take a look at this code in _http_agent.js there may be a bug.