-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.7k
crypto: use map for lazy require cache #40378
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
16f69b2 to
a74731e
Compare
a74731e to
16daadc
Compare
|
The |
|
@jasnell I can tell from the user land snapshot prototype that (at least a basic subset of) crypto works in user land snapshot, which doesn't assume the snapshotted state to be stateless since it'll re-initialize the command line arguments etc. during snapshot dehydration. However I am not yet sure if it's safe to include crypto in the startup snapshot which needs to be stateless, since it's a lot of code to vet for now.. |
|
thank you @jasnell ! I think what I was trying to say is that to my understanding Line 287 in 4f68839
webcrypto: {
configurable: false,
enumerable: true,
get() { return lazyRequire('internal/crypto/webcrypto').crypto; }
},
unless the internal webcrypto: {
configurable: false,
enumerable: true,
get() { return require('internal/crypto/webcrypto').crypto; }
},and for the crypto sub-modules loading, e.g. this: node/lib/internal/crypto/webcrypto.js Line 85 in 4441c3e
case 'RSA-OAEP':
return lazyRequire('internal/crypto/rsa')
.rsaKeyGenerate(algorithm, extractable, keyUsages);would be pretty much the same as: case 'RSA-OAEP':
return require('internal/crypto/rsa')
.rsaKeyGenerate(algorithm, extractable, keyUsages);both of the above examples using |
|
This needs a rebase. |
|
This issue/PR was marked as stalled, it will be automatically closed in 30 days. If it should remain open, please leave a comment explaining why it should remain open. |
|
Closing this because it has stalled. Feel free to reopen if this issue/PR is still relevant, or to ping the collaborator who labelled it stalled if you have any questions. |
I'm curious why this
lazyRequirefunction exists. wouldn't it be sufficient enough to callrequiredirectly instead and achieve the same 'lazy' result?if that's the case, I can spin up another PR or repurpose this one.