-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: fix "test-internet.yml" workflows #40177
doc: fix "test-internet.yml" workflows #40177
Conversation
Thank you @suryapratapsinghsuryavanshi! |
Welcome, @tniessen :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm always amazed that the only way to know if a workflow file is valid is to ship it and wait for GitHub to try and execute it...
Fast-track has been requested by @targos. Please 👍 to approve. |
Yeah, but there is another way that we should use an IDE which checks whether our YAML file is valid or not because most of the time the indentation is in the wrong places. |
Shouldn't the subsystem be |
Yes. I'll fix that on landing. Thanks for flagging it. |
At least for this one, we shouldn't have to wait because it can be started manually... |
PR-URL: #40177 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Landed in c7da13c. Thanks for the contribution! 🎉 |
Looks like it works now. (I haven't waited for the tests to pass, but the fact that they're even running is farther than it was getting before!) https://github.com/nodejs/node/runs/3681508986?check_suite_focus=true Thanks for the fix! |
@Trott, Your Welcome :) |
PR-URL: #40177 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
No description provided.