[v12.x] doc: mark modules implementation as stable #37718
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
/cc @nodejs/modules |
guybedford
approved these changes
Mar 11, 2021
aduh95
approved these changes
Mar 11, 2021
GeoffreyBooth
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2021
PR-URL: nodejs#35781 Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#37718 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Derek Lewis <[email protected]>
richardlau
force-pushed
the
modules-stable-v12.x
branch
from
467a54f
to
bf8733f
Compare
|
Landed in bf8733f. |
1 task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We had kept the implementation as experimental to leave room for large changes that might land prior to 16. With the Semver-Major cut-off looming I don't think we'll be seeing any. Let's mark ESM stable and make it clear that folks can use this in prod
PR-URL: #35781
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina [email protected]
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum [email protected]
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott [email protected]
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso [email protected]
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann [email protected]
Reviewed-By: James M Snell [email protected]
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins [email protected]
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel [email protected]
Reviewed-By: Derek Lewis [email protected]