Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: process.nextTick for beforeExit case #37012

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

ttzztztz
Copy link
Contributor

This is a test for test case test/parallel/test-process-beforeexit.js to test the behavior of process.nextTick with process.on('beforeExit', ()=>{}) event

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Jan 21, 2021
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@Flarna Flarna added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Jan 21, 2021
Copy link
Member

@juanarbol juanarbol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ttzztztz Thank you! This is amazing.

test/parallel/test-process-beforeexit.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Jan 24, 2021

Welcome @ttzztztz and thanks for the pull request!

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

test/parallel/test-process-beforeexit.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/parallel/test-process-beforeexit.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/parallel/test-process-beforeexit.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/parallel/test-process-beforeexit.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2021
PR-URL: #37012
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Jan 25, 2021

Landed in 1377163

@jasnell jasnell closed this Jan 25, 2021
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2021
PR-URL: #37012
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Feb 2, 2021
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2021
PR-URL: #37012
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@danielleadams danielleadams mentioned this pull request May 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants