repl: handle comments properly #3515

thefourtheye · 2015-10-25T18:21:28Z

As it is, the comments are not handled properly in REPL. So, if the
comments have ' or ", then they are treated as string literals and
the error is thrown in REPL.

This patch refactors the existing logic and groups everything in a
class.

Fixes: #3421

cc @mscdex @silverwind @ChuckLangford @Fishrock123

mscdex · 2015-10-25T19:04:09Z

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/view/iojs/job/node-test-pull-request/609/

LGTM

ChuckLangford · 2015-10-26T01:09:40Z

test/parallel/test-repl.js

+    { client: client_unix, send: 'function x() {\n//"\n }',
+      expect: prompt_multiline + prompt_multiline +
+              'undefined\n' + prompt_unix },
+    { client: client_unix, send: 'function x() {//"\n }',


The code changes LGTM.

This being my first core review I have a question, how detailed do we get with tests? The test on line 260 is good but I don't see the same test for a single quote.

@ChuckLangford Thanks for the feedback. I thought I covered it in 254, but we have both tests at 257 and 260. More tests is good I guess :-) I included that now. PTAL.

As it is, the comments are not handled properly in REPL. So, if the comments have `'` or `"`, then they are treated as string literals and the error is thrown in REPL. This patch refactors the existing logic and groups everything in a class. Fixes: nodejs#3421

targos · 2015-10-26T07:19:22Z

lib/repl.js

+    this.shouldFail = false;
+    const wasWithinStrLiteral = this._literal !== null;
+
+    for (let i = 0; i < line.length; i += 1) {


suggestion: use a for...of loop

Oh yeah, I'll change it.

thefourtheye · 2015-10-26T07:35:04Z

@targos I modified the PR as per your suggestions. PTAL.

ChuckLangford · 2015-10-26T11:28:19Z

LGTM

Fishrock123 · 2015-10-26T17:24:04Z

lib/repl.js

+    this.shouldFail = false;
+    const wasWithinStrLiteral = this._literal !== null;
+
+    for (const current of line) {


This is for (... of ...) on a String? I was unaware that worked.

@Fishrock123 It actually works.

'use strict'; for (const chr of "abcd") { console.log(chr); }

It works and has the advantage to handle unicode correctly:

Fishrock123 · 2015-10-26T17:28:21Z

Seems fine so far to me.

Fishrock123 · 2015-10-26T17:53:28Z

LGTM if it works

thefourtheye · 2015-10-27T12:08:54Z

Yet another CI run: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/626/

jasnell · 2015-10-27T17:15:33Z

semver-minor?

thefourtheye · 2015-10-27T17:44:21Z

@jasnell Hmmm, wouldn't this be just a bug fix? Also, can we backport this to 4.x LTS? People who use REPL will be impacted.

jasnell · 2015-10-27T17:49:31Z

Yes and no. If it's, "Previously the REPL didn't support comments, now it does", then it's a new feature, semver-minor, and should not land in v4.x. However, if it's, "REPL was always supposed to support comments and we consider this a regression", then a case can be made for landing it in v4.x.

Fishrock123 · 2015-10-27T17:56:20Z

If it helps I think this should be fixed in v4.x.

jasnell · 2015-10-27T18:18:06Z

It does help. Getting some others from the @nodejs/tsc and @nodejs/lts teams to chime in would help also. I'm leaning towards a yes for v4.x also.

silverwind · 2015-10-27T18:18:10Z

I don't see this as semver-worthy. The expectation is that you can paste any JS into the REPL, so this is a 'feature' that should've been there from the start. Also, I'd be surprised if this is not actually a regression.

As it is, the comments are not handled properly in REPL. So, if the comments have `'` or `"`, then they are treated as incomplete string literals and the error is thrown in REPL. This patch refactors the existing logic and groups everything in a class. Fixes: #3421 PR-URL: #3515 Reviewed-By: Brian White <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]>

thefourtheye · 2015-10-28T02:03:02Z

Thanks for the review people. Landed at 6cf1910

As it is, the comments are not handled properly in REPL. So, if the comments have `'` or `"`, then they are treated as incomplete string literals and the error is thrown in REPL. This patch refactors the existing logic and groups everything in a class. Fixes: #3421 PR-URL: #3515 Reviewed-By: Brian White <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]>

jasnell · 2015-10-28T15:31:24Z

Landed in v4.x-staging in d918838

As it is, the comments are not handled properly in REPL. So, if the comments have `'` or `"`, then they are treated as incomplete string literals and the error is thrown in REPL. This patch refactors the existing logic and groups everything in a class. Fixes: nodejs#3421 PR-URL: nodejs#3515 Reviewed-By: Brian White <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]>

As it is, the comments are not handled properly in REPL. So, if the comments have `'` or `"`, then they are treated as incomplete string literals and the error is thrown in REPL. This patch refactors the existing logic and groups everything in a class. Fixes: #3421 PR-URL: #3515 Reviewed-By: Brian White <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]>

thefourtheye added the repl Issues and PRs related to the REPL subsystem. label Oct 25, 2015

thefourtheye mentioned this pull request Oct 25, 2015

repl hates comments with quotes in indented code #3421

Closed

thefourtheye force-pushed the fix-comments-in-repl branch 2 times, most recently from 67fa425 to 8179911 Compare October 25, 2015 18:33

ChuckLangford reviewed Oct 26, 2015
View reviewed changes

thefourtheye force-pushed the fix-comments-in-repl branch from 8179911 to 5f656db Compare October 26, 2015 02:23

targos reviewed Oct 26, 2015
View reviewed changes

addressing targos's comments

60aeee5

Fishrock123 reviewed Oct 26, 2015
View reviewed changes

jasnell added the lts-watch-v4.x label Oct 27, 2015

thefourtheye closed this Oct 28, 2015

thefourtheye deleted the fix-comments-in-repl branch October 28, 2015 02:03

jasnell added land-on-v4.x and removed lts-watch-v4.x labels Oct 28, 2015

jasnell mentioned this pull request Oct 28, 2015

Preparing v4.2.2 LTS Maintenance nodejs/Release#50

Closed

rvagg mentioned this pull request Oct 29, 2015

Release proposal: v5.0.0 #3466

Merged

jasnell mentioned this pull request Oct 29, 2015

Release Proposal: v4.2.2 "Argon" (LTS) #3588

Closed

jasnell removed the land-on-v4.x label Nov 3, 2015

This was referenced Apr 29, 2023

[Snyk] Security upgrade karma from 3.1.4 to 5.0.8 aliscco/alisco-node#375

Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade karma from 3.1.4 to 5.0.8 aliscco/alisco-node#379

Open

leonardoadame mentioned this pull request Jul 9, 2023

[Snyk] Security upgrade karma from 3.1.4 to 5.0.8 leonardoadame/node#143

Open

aliscco mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2023

[Snyk] Security upgrade karma from 3.1.4 to 5.0.8 aliscco/alisco-node#646

Open

aliscco mentioned this pull request Nov 28, 2023

[Snyk] Security upgrade karma from 3.1.4 to 5.0.8 aliscco/alisco-node#695

Open

This was referenced Nov 29, 2023

[Snyk] Security upgrade karma from 3.1.4 to 5.0.8 leonardoadame/node#211

Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade karma from 3.1.4 to 5.0.8 leonardoadame/node#268

Open

aliscco mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2023

[Snyk] Security upgrade karma from 3.1.4 to 5.0.8 aliscco/alisco-node#1024

Open

leonardoadame mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2023

[Snyk] Security upgrade karma from 3.1.4 to 5.0.8 leonardoadame/node#479

Open

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

repl: handle comments properly #3515

repl: handle comments properly #3515

thefourtheye commented Oct 25, 2015

mscdex commented Oct 25, 2015

ChuckLangford Oct 26, 2015

thefourtheye Oct 26, 2015

targos Oct 26, 2015

thefourtheye Oct 26, 2015

thefourtheye commented Oct 26, 2015

ChuckLangford commented Oct 26, 2015

Fishrock123 Oct 26, 2015

thefourtheye Oct 26, 2015

targos Oct 26, 2015

Fishrock123 commented Oct 26, 2015

Fishrock123 commented Oct 26, 2015

thefourtheye commented Oct 27, 2015

jasnell commented Oct 27, 2015

thefourtheye commented Oct 27, 2015

jasnell commented Oct 27, 2015

Fishrock123 commented Oct 27, 2015

jasnell commented Oct 27, 2015

silverwind commented Oct 27, 2015

thefourtheye commented Oct 28, 2015

jasnell commented Oct 28, 2015

repl: handle comments properly #3515

repl: handle comments properly #3515

Conversation

thefourtheye commented Oct 25, 2015

mscdex commented Oct 25, 2015

ChuckLangford Oct 26, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

thefourtheye Oct 26, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

targos Oct 26, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

thefourtheye Oct 26, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

thefourtheye commented Oct 26, 2015

ChuckLangford commented Oct 26, 2015

Fishrock123 Oct 26, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

thefourtheye Oct 26, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

targos Oct 26, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Fishrock123 commented Oct 26, 2015

Fishrock123 commented Oct 26, 2015

thefourtheye commented Oct 27, 2015

jasnell commented Oct 27, 2015

thefourtheye commented Oct 27, 2015

jasnell commented Oct 27, 2015

Fishrock123 commented Oct 27, 2015

jasnell commented Oct 27, 2015

silverwind commented Oct 27, 2015

thefourtheye commented Oct 28, 2015

jasnell commented Oct 28, 2015