Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lib: removes unused params #32694

Closed

Conversation

JesuHrz
Copy link
Contributor

@JesuHrz JesuHrz commented Apr 6, 2020

This PR removes the options params from readSync and writeFileHandle functions as it's never used within them.

  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system. label Apr 6, 2020
@JesuHrz JesuHrz changed the title lib: removes unnecessary params lib: removes unused params Apr 6, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@himself65 himself65 added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Apr 10, 2020
@himself65 himself65 self-assigned this Apr 10, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

himself65 pushed a commit to himself65/node that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2020
PR-URL: nodejs#32694
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <[email protected]>
@himself65
Copy link
Member

Landed in 4076e04

Thanks for your contributions!🎉

@himself65 himself65 closed this Apr 10, 2020
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Apr 10, 2020

The code change here is fine, but the commit message isn't very informative. Adding in the one-sentence description from the PR would have been an easy and significant improvement, as would have changing the subsystem from lib to fs. We (reviewers) should probably get more in the habit of checking commit messages and commenting on them when they need better content. We tend to comment when someone uses an invalid subsystem or whatever, but that's not as valuable as a message content review.

targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2020
PR-URL: #32694
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2020
PR-URL: #32694
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2020
PR-URL: #32694
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants