-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[v12.x backport] module: drop support for extensionless main entry points in esm #32280
[v12.x backport] module: drop support for extensionless main entry points in esm #32280
Conversation
4d3b533
to
8e8b655
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
8e8b655
to
e1a4de2
Compare
e1a4de2
to
287ef5f
Compare
I've created #32282 to deal with that. |
287ef5f
to
4ee0478
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
2047cca
to
0606e1d
Compare
4ee0478
to
3f31b1a
Compare
3f31b1a
to
bb4fbbe
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
bb4fbbe
to
3e13dc7
Compare
009d0a2
to
0da01a7
Compare
@codebytere I've been struggling with this for over a week now and I just can't get CI to pass. From what I can tell of the CI jobs that are failing, like
When I run locally, I get this error with
Perhaps we need to increase the allowable delta here? |
@codebytere I keep resuming CI, but Can we land this, since the problem appears to be in the staging branch? |
As the failure seems unrelated to this PR and on the staging branch I think this is ok to land @codebytere thoughts? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
RSLGTM
63a03d2
to
d577190
Compare
@GeoffreyBooth staging should be good to rebase against, then we can get this landed. |
PR-URL: nodejs#31415 Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#32280 Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
0da01a7
to
b6ad757
Compare
I've updated the rebase here. |
Backport-PR-URL: #32280 PR-URL: #31415 Backport-PR-URL: #32280 Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
finally green! Landed in 4ee41c5 |
Backport of #31415. Thank you @codebytere for the prompt!
This isn't as clean as it could be because of 04d07ed. @bmeck or @guybedford do you mind double-checking this? I'm assuming that we don't want to merge into 12 the commit that was reverted.