-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
napi: rename 'promise' parameter to 'value' #31544
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This change makes it clear that the value doesn't need to be a Promise, and makes the signature consistent with other napi_is_* functions.
nodejs-github-bot
added
the
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
label
Jan 28, 2020
legendecas
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2020
addaleax
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2020
devnexen
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2020
cjihrig
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2020
jasnell
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2020
tniessen
added
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
node-api
Issues and PRs related to the Node-API.
labels
Jan 30, 2020
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Trott
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2020
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Landed in a171314 |
Trott
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2020
This change makes it clear that the value doesn't need to be a Promise, and makes the signature consistent with other napi_is_* functions. PR-URL: #31544 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2020
This change makes it clear that the value doesn't need to be a Promise, and makes the signature consistent with other napi_is_* functions. PR-URL: #31544 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Merged
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2020
This change makes it clear that the value doesn't need to be a Promise, and makes the signature consistent with other napi_is_* functions. PR-URL: #31544 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2020
This change makes it clear that the value doesn't need to be a Promise, and makes the signature consistent with other napi_is_* functions. PR-URL: #31544 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Merged
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2020
This change makes it clear that the value doesn't need to be a Promise, and makes the signature consistent with other napi_is_* functions. PR-URL: #31544 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
tniessen
removed
the
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
label
Jan 14, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change makes it clear that the value doesn't need to be a Promise, and makes the signature consistent with other
napi_is_*
functions.Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes