Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

stream: simplify Writable.write #31146

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ronag
Copy link
Member

@ronag ronag commented Dec 31, 2019

Simplifies Writable.write and adds an optimization where if you pass 'buffer' as the encoding parameter to write(chunk, encoding, cb) it will bypass a slow path where we check whether chunk is a Buffer or not.

#31146 (comment)

```js streams/writable-manywrites.js sync='no' n=2000000 0.98 % ±2.18% ±2.88% ±3.72% streams/writable-manywrites.js sync='yes' n=2000000 *** 30.92 % ±4.45% ±5.93% ±7.76% ````
Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the stream Issues and PRs related to the stream subsystem. label Dec 31, 2019
@ronag ronag force-pushed the stream-write-simplify branch 4 times, most recently from e5ca143 to 4741a70 Compare January 1, 2020 11:38
@ronag ronag changed the title stream: simplify Writable.write stream: write with 'buffer' Jan 1, 2020
Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm with green CITGM

lib/_stream_writable.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
benchmark/streams/writable-manywrites.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Jan 1, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@lpinca
Copy link
Member

lpinca commented Jan 1, 2020

@nodejs/streams

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Jan 1, 2020

lgtm with green CITGM

CITGM: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/citgm-smoker/2176/ ✔️

@ronag
Copy link
Member Author

ronag commented Jan 1, 2020

@BridgeAR: Applied your comment regarding typeof vs instanceof here as well

@mscdex
Copy link
Contributor

mscdex commented Jan 2, 2020

Benchmark CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js%20benchmark/job/benchmark-node-micro-benchmarks/499/console

streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='no' writev='no' encoding='buffer' sync='no' n=1000000             *     -2.77 %       ±2.12% ±2.80%  ±3.63%
streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='no' writev='no' encoding='buffer' sync='yes' n=1000000          ***    -23.16 %       ±4.65% ±6.21%  ±8.14%
streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='no' writev='no' encoding='' sync='no' n=1000000                          0.00 %       ±1.27% ±1.69%  ±2.17%
streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='no' writev='no' encoding='' sync='yes' n=1000000                         1.67 %       ±5.11% ±6.80%  ±8.86%
streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='no' writev='yes' encoding='buffer' sync='no' n=1000000          ***    -13.38 %       ±1.96% ±2.60%  ±3.36%
streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='no' writev='yes' encoding='buffer' sync='yes' n=1000000         ***    -19.33 %       ±4.21% ±5.62%  ±7.35%
streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='no' writev='yes' encoding='' sync='no' n=1000000                        -0.51 %       ±2.27% ±3.01%  ±3.88%
streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='no' writev='yes' encoding='' sync='yes' n=1000000                        3.47 %       ±4.99% ±6.65%  ±8.68%
streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='yes' writev='no' encoding='buffer' sync='no' n=1000000            *     -1.28 %       ±1.11% ±1.47%  ±1.90%
streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='yes' writev='no' encoding='buffer' sync='yes' n=1000000         ***    -20.16 %       ±5.16% ±6.88%  ±8.99%
streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='yes' writev='no' encoding='' sync='no' n=1000000                        -0.28 %       ±2.24% ±2.96%  ±3.83%
streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='yes' writev='no' encoding='' sync='yes' n=1000000                       -3.40 %       ±5.56% ±7.40%  ±9.63%
streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='yes' writev='yes' encoding='buffer' sync='no' n=1000000         ***     -9.50 %       ±2.43% ±3.22%  ±4.15%
streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='yes' writev='yes' encoding='buffer' sync='yes' n=1000000        ***    -15.69 %       ±5.18% ±6.89%  ±8.98%
streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='yes' writev='yes' encoding='' sync='no' n=1000000                        0.27 %       ±2.86% ±3.78%  ±4.88%
streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='yes' writev='yes' encoding='' sync='yes' n=1000000              ***     10.14 %       ±5.79% ±7.72% ±10.09%

Seems like a lot of bad regressions...

mscdex
mscdex previously requested changes Jan 2, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@mscdex mscdex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Performance regressions should be resolved first

@ronag
Copy link
Member Author

ronag commented Jan 2, 2020

I'm a little confused what happened here. Passing 'buffer' now seems to have a significant negative instead of positive performance impact.

I've slightly changed this to not include the encoding !== 'buffer' "fast/slow" path.

 streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='no' writev='no' sync='no' n=2000000            **      2.84 %       ±1.80% ±2.38% ±3.08%
 streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='no' writev='no' sync='yes' n=2000000                  -1.17 %       ±1.80% ±2.39% ±3.12%
 streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='no' writev='yes' sync='no' n=2000000           **      2.03 %       ±1.23% ±1.62% ±2.09%
 streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='no' writev='yes' sync='yes' n=2000000                 -1.34 %       ±2.10% ±2.82% ±3.71%
 streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='yes' writev='no' sync='no' n=2000000                   1.26 %       ±1.47% ±1.95% ±2.51%
 streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='yes' writev='no' sync='yes' n=2000000                 -0.73 %       ±2.41% ±3.21% ±4.21%
 streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='yes' writev='yes' sync='no' n=2000000          **      2.30 %       ±1.39% ±1.84% ±2.39%
 streams/writable-manywrites.js callback='yes' writev='yes' sync='yes' n=2000000                 1.45 %       ±2.27% ±3.04% ±4.01%

@ronag ronag changed the title stream: write with 'buffer' stream: simplify Writable.write Jan 2, 2020
@ronag ronag force-pushed the stream-write-simplify branch 2 times, most recently from 4eb510d to 7e59633 Compare January 2, 2020 11:06
@BridgeAR BridgeAR removed the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Jan 2, 2020
@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

BridgeAR commented Jan 2, 2020

@ronag I think it makes sense to keep the encoding part in the benchmark. That way it's easier to identify regressions.

@ronag
Copy link
Member Author

ronag commented Jan 2, 2020

@ronag I think it makes sense to keep the encoding part in the benchmark. That way it's easier to identify regressions.

But right now the encoding part doesn't do anything with 'buffer'? It would just unnecessarily make the benchmark run slower.

lib/_stream_writable.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

BridgeAR commented Jan 2, 2020

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

BridgeAR commented Jan 2, 2020

@mscdex the performance issue is resolved. PTAL.

@ronag
Copy link
Member Author

ronag commented Feb 9, 2020

rebased

@ronag ronag added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. and removed blocked PRs that are blocked by other issues or PRs. labels Feb 9, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented Feb 9, 2020

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@ronag
Copy link
Member Author

ronag commented Feb 9, 2020

@ronag
Copy link
Member Author

ronag commented Feb 14, 2020

@mcollina: Just a quick post rebase LGTM before landing?

Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@ronag
Copy link
Member Author

ronag commented Feb 14, 2020

Whatever is causing #31146 (comment) needs to be fixed....

I believe this was resolved in a different commit related to http2.

@ronag
Copy link
Member Author

ronag commented Feb 14, 2020

Landed in 194f2e20db11

@ronag ronag closed this Feb 14, 2020
ronag added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2020
Slightly refactors Writable.write for minor perf
and readability improvements.

PR-URL: #31146
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
@codebytere
Copy link
Member

@ronag this'll need manual bp it looks like, but feel free to swap out the label with dont-land if we shouldn't land it.

@ronag
Copy link
Member Author

ronag commented Mar 10, 2020

@MylesBorins this will now land cleanly on 13.x-staging

MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2020
Slightly refactors Writable.write for minor perf
and readability improvements.

PR-URL: #31146
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. stream Issues and PRs related to the stream subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.