Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: update REPL documentation to instantiate the REPL #30928

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

The documentation currently states that it's not intended to directly
instantiate REPL instances. It is unknown for what reason that's
recommended as it does seem a proper way to handle new REPL instances.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

The documentation currently states that it's not intended to directly
instantiate REPL instances. It is unknown for what reason that's
recommended as it does seem a proper way to handle new REPL instances.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. repl Issues and PRs related to the REPL subsystem. labels Dec 13, 2019
doc/api/repl.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Dec 13, 2019

Bottom reference needs to be corrected but other than that, looks good to me.

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member Author

@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Dec 13, 2019
@addaleax
Copy link
Member

@BridgeAR Using repl.start() and new REPLServer() are not equivalent, though, and the documentation seems to imply otherwise? Can you also change the code to work the same in both cases, and then add that to the YAML changelog?

@addaleax addaleax removed the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Dec 14, 2019
@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member Author

@addaleax I'll add a note about the behavior difference. The behavior of .start is somewhat special though: it just adds the very first repl instance as property on the export. I am not certain what reason there was to add this. The commit that adds this property does not indicate any reasons for it either (the description and main code change is about a different feature).
What do you think about checking the usage with Gzemnid and citgm and to deprecate that property if it's not frequently used? My guess is that this property is not used at all.

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

@BridgeAR It adds the repl to replMap. That’s the more important bit here imo.

What do you think about checking the usage with Gzemnid and citgm and to deprecate that property if it's not frequently used? My guess is that this property is not used at all.

I think both tools would be useless in this case, and I see no reason to deprecate. repl.repl is the way to access the current REPL instance from the REPL itself, and I expect programmatic usage to be minimal.

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member Author

@addaleax I somehow did not really think about accessing the current REPL. That is indeed something we should not remove. I think we should move that into the constructor and either only make this accessible in the standalone repl or each instance instead of exporting the very first repl instance that is created with .start() in each repl instance.
I'll mark this PR as blocked and open a PR to implement the exposure when using it as standalone REPL.

It adds the repl to replMap

I removed replMap in a recent commit. So that's not an issue anymore.

@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the blocked PRs that are blocked by other issues or PRs. label Dec 15, 2019
@BridgeAR BridgeAR mentioned this pull request Dec 15, 2019
4 tasks
@BridgeAR BridgeAR removed the blocked PRs that are blocked by other issues or PRs. label Jan 3, 2020
BridgeAR added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2020
The documentation currently states that it's not intended to directly
instantiate REPL instances. It is unknown for what reason that's
recommended as it does seem a proper way to handle new REPL instances.

PR-URL: #30928
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member Author

BridgeAR commented Jan 3, 2020

Landed in 84b15eb 🎉

@BridgeAR BridgeAR closed this Jan 3, 2020
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2020
The documentation currently states that it's not intended to directly
instantiate REPL instances. It is unknown for what reason that's
recommended as it does seem a proper way to handle new REPL instances.

PR-URL: #30928
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@BridgeAR BridgeAR mentioned this pull request Jan 7, 2020
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2020
The documentation currently states that it's not intended to directly
instantiate REPL instances. It is unknown for what reason that's
recommended as it does seem a proper way to handle new REPL instances.

PR-URL: #30928
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@BridgeAR BridgeAR deleted the update-repl-start-doc branch January 20, 2020 12:07
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2020
The documentation currently states that it's not intended to directly
instantiate REPL instances. It is unknown for what reason that's
recommended as it does seem a proper way to handle new REPL instances.

PR-URL: #30928
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Feb 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. repl Issues and PRs related to the REPL subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants